On 29-May-2002 Kolbe Kegel wrote:
but using the no silly unnecessary features line sounds a
little better than i don't use it, so i won't know if it works or not
to me.
This principle has actually worked very well in the software world.
People tend to make tools that they use and
I'm not sure if this has already been discussed or not (maybe I missed
it), but a feature that I've always loved from WindowMaker/Enlightenment
is the ability to scroll the mouse-wheel over the root window (or even
the toolbar maybe?) and change workspaces. It really grows on you.
This doesn't
On 29-May-2002 Mr.X wrote:
I'm not sure if this has already been discussed or not (maybe I missed
it), but a feature that I've always loved from WindowMaker/Enlightenment
is the ability to scroll the mouse-wheel over the root window (or even
the toolbar maybe?) and change workspaces. It
i would never try to tell someone giving me awesome free stuff how to do
what they do, but at some point when the beast has grown big enough, you
have to let some other people help you fight it, even if they haven't
been there as long and haven't been battle hardened per se. there are
plenty
On 29-May-2002 Kolbe Kegel wrote:
i would never try to tell someone giving me awesome free stuff how to do
what they do, but at some point when the beast has grown big enough, you
have to let some other people help you fight it, even if they haven't
been there as long and haven't been
On Tue, 28 May 2002 22:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is so few people know X, real X not GTK or KDE. Most of
the bugs we get are I opened this thing and it acted weird. Brad
was commenting a few days ago about how he was hoping two years later