On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:32:35 +1030
John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that things are busy with the development of blackbox, but I
think it would be a good if we could finalise the web page model that we
are going to use; and if a maintainer could be decided.
Will a webpage be set-up to
On Tue, 2002-01-15 at 22:11, Ben Neuman wrote:
I was wondering about this, too. I'm a bit concerned, however - what
if the webpage about the webpages' layout is poor and not
minimalistic? We ought to have some candidates for the blackbox
webpage-about-the-webpages in order to decide which we
scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umm... is anyone the designated webmaster for the blackbox website? A few
people have requested changes to the HTML, updating of links and such. I've
got time between now and Jan 22nd to do some work on the website to bring it
up to date with the current
I'll be happy to help as well. I'd suggest that Sean creates another
user-account on SF to allow whoever will be in charge to modify
blackboxwm.sourceforge.net
once we find our sucker (-:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 December 2001 13:57, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I'll be happy to help as well. I'd suggest that Sean creates another
user-account on SF to allow whoever will be in charge to modify
blackboxwm.sourceforge.net
once we find
Well, if updating the website won't take more than a few hours a month,
and if changes don't need to be made with extreme urgency - i'll volunteer
to be that sucker (or perhaps the co-sucker with someone else ;). As long
as the website takes up a reasonable amount of time -- since i'm going
Umm... is anyone the designated webmaster for the blackbox website? A few
people have requested changes to the HTML, updating of links and such. I've
got time between now and Jan 22nd to do some work on the website to bring it
up to date with the current state of coding. So if nobody is
