Re: xorg defines

2005-07-21 Thread Andrew Benton
Kevin Jordan wrote: The compile line doesn't seem to be pulling in pthreads with -pthread or -lpthread. Indeed. I had even worked that out for myself. The solution was to simply export LDFLAGS=-lpthread The odd thing is that libpthread is where it should be, /usr/lib, so why should

Re: xorg defines

2005-07-21 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 7/21/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin Jordan wrote: The compile line doesn't seem to be pulling in pthreads with -pthread or -lpthread. Indeed. I had even worked that out for myself. The solution was to simply export LDFLAGS=-lpthread The odd thing is that

Re: xorg defines

2005-07-21 Thread Andrew Benton
Tushar Teredesai wrote: The error that you are getting has nothing to do with X being installed in /usr. I think one of the libraries that freeglut links against is not linked to libpthread. Hmm...if I put the line #define ProjectRoot /usr in my host.def file then X installs in /usr and

Re: xorg defines

2005-07-21 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 7/21/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: The error that you are getting has nothing to do with X being installed in /usr. I think one of the libraries that freeglut links against is not linked to libpthread. Hmm...if I put the line #define ProjectRoot

Re: xorg defines

2005-07-21 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 7/21/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: Which version of freeglut did you test? I could compile freeglut-2.4.0 without any problems. freeglut-2.4.0 Did you compile xorg or XFree86? I built XFree86-4.5.0 xorg. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Planning for BLFS 6.1

2005-07-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 07/20/05 00:50 CST: On 7/10/05, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that LFS 6.1 has been released, we need to develop a strategy for the release of BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 52 outstanding bugs. Down to 42. And back up to 77 after going

BLFS SVN Index

2005-07-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, At this point, with the work Manuel did and all the other Editors providing additional descriptions and what-not to the Indexing of the book, I think we can safely remove the This is incomplete ... part at the beginning of the Index. Does anyone feel that we shouldn't at this point? --

Re: BLFS SVN Index

2005-07-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, At this point, with the work Manuel did and all the other Editors providing additional descriptions and what-not to the Indexing of the book, I think we can safely remove the This is incomplete ... part at the beginning of the Index. It will always be

Re: BLFS SVN Index

2005-07-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/21/05 16:57 CST: It will always be incomplete is moe sense. :) No Bruce, it's mo', not moe. As in, I need some mo' money. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10

Re: OpenOffice-1.1.5

2005-07-21 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: 1.1.5 will be out shortly. The current 1.1.4 patches apply to the RC For anyone interested...1.1.5 is moving quickly http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/openoffice/contrib/rc/1.1.5rc2/OOo_1.1.5rc2_src.tar.gz -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev