Re: BLFS-XML: internal subsets and XIncludes

2006-01-25 Thread Nico R.
M.Canales.es wrote: [...] To fix this bug all entities found in Xincluded files must be replaced by their values in the output, and that, for the BLFS sources, is equivalent to tell to xmllint that must to replace all entities in the output using: $ xmllint --nonet --xinclude --noent

Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Nico R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hello! I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the BLFS book; thanks to Manuel for the

Re: iso-codes requirement

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Staub
Jay D. McHugh wrote: ISO Codes doesn't list Python as being a requirement (optional or required) but when I tried to install it without first installing Python, this is what happened (it worked fine once I installed Python): Looks like it. From the Changelog: * Now depend on python. Closes:

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why? Bruce, another option is to use xsvg that's in the cairo

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/25/06 11:24 CST: When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why?

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nico R. wrote: Hello! I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the BLFS book;

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/25/06 12:30 CST: Not exactly. You left --enable-canvas on by default and that's not standard. I thought of that after I had already sent the email. I was hoping nobody would notice. :-) However, as was discussed in the extensive discussion Jeremy referred

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Additionally, the librsvg library (BLFS Chapter 9) includes a stand-alone tool for viewing SVG files, and can optionally create an SVG plugin for Moz/Firefox. I'm not sure how good the plugin works, though. I've never tried it. I've heard

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Richard A Downing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:27:11 +0100 Nico R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical representation of the BLFS dependencies. snip Awesome! Thanks Nico. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Richard A Downing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for today: http://www.langside.org.uk/images/blfs.svg Wow, that's insane. Thanks, Richard. Consider it downloaded. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: I don't mean this to be rude or condescending to you specifically, Bruce, but I just felt that most would heed the note to review the file and enable it if they wanted it. Just out of curiosity, did you not want it when you initially built Firefox? Nah. You aren't

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Andrew Benton
Bruce Dubbs wrote: According to what I read, most FF binaries come with svg built in. I now think that it would be expected by most users and should be the default. +1 Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Anduin files

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, This is directed to everyone who has write access to the /srv/www area on Anduin. Is there any reason why you had to pull out the .../files/BLFS area. There were production files in there and now the book is broken. Isn't this something that could have been discussed first? -- Randy

Re: Anduin files

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 01/25/06 14:51 CST: Is there any reason why you had to pull out the .../files/BLFS area. There were production files in there and now the book is broken. Sorry for the noise. I am mistaken. If I could type, this wouldn't have been necessary. -- Randy

Re: Move package management to LFS

2006-01-25 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Go ahead and put into LFS whatever you think is appropriate and we'll do the right thing afterward. OK, this is now in LFS as of r7301. I think you need to review the text: I already did...honest :-) Package Management