M.Canales.es wrote:
[...]
To fix this bug all entities found in Xincluded files must be replaced by
their values in the output, and that, for the BLFS sources, is equivalent to
tell to xmllint that must to replace all entities in the output using:
$ xmllint --nonet --xinclude --noent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello!
I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical
representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked
how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the
BLFS book; thanks to Manuel for the
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
ISO Codes doesn't list Python as being a requirement (optional or
required) but when I tried to install it without first installing
Python, this is what happened (it worked fine once I installed Python):
Looks like it. From the Changelog:
* Now depend on python. Closes:
On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I
didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we
don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why?
Bruce, another option is to use xsvg that's in the cairo
On 1/25/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/25/06 11:24 CST:
When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I
didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we
don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why?
On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nico R. wrote:
Hello!
I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical
representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked
how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the
BLFS book;
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/25/06 12:30 CST:
Not exactly. You left --enable-canvas on by default and that's not standard.
I thought of that after I had already sent the email. I was hoping
nobody would notice. :-)
However, as was discussed in the extensive discussion Jeremy referred
On 1/25/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, the librsvg library (BLFS Chapter 9) includes a
stand-alone tool for viewing SVG files, and can optionally create
an SVG plugin for Moz/Firefox. I'm not sure how good the plugin
works, though. I've never tried it.
I've heard
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:27:11 +0100
Nico R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical
representation of the BLFS dependencies.
snip
Awesome! Thanks Nico.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
On 1/25/06, Richard A Downing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for today:
http://www.langside.org.uk/images/blfs.svg
Wow, that's insane. Thanks, Richard. Consider it downloaded.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I don't mean this to be rude or condescending to you specifically,
Bruce, but I just felt that most would heed the note to review the
file and enable it if they wanted it. Just out of curiosity, did you
not want it when you initially built Firefox?
Nah. You aren't
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
According to what I read, most FF binaries come with svg built in. I
now think that it would be expected by most users and should be the default.
+1
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Hi all,
This is directed to everyone who has write access to the /srv/www
area on Anduin.
Is there any reason why you had to pull out the .../files/BLFS
area. There were production files in there and now the book is broken.
Isn't this something that could have been discussed first?
--
Randy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 01/25/06 14:51 CST:
Is there any reason why you had to pull out the .../files/BLFS
area. There were production files in there and now the book is broken.
Sorry for the noise. I am mistaken. If I could type, this wouldn't have
been necessary.
--
Randy
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Go ahead and put into LFS whatever you think is appropriate and we'll
do the right thing afterward.
OK, this is now in LFS as of r7301.
I think you need to review the text:
I already did...honest :-)
Package Management
15 matches
Mail list logo