On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Richard Downing wrote:
So I think the project needs a challenge. Trouble is I can't think what
it is!
HLFS?
Alex :-)
--
Pippin
Computer Monkey to the Pelican
www.oxrev.org.uk, www.corpusjcr.org, www.rev.org.uk
pgplwsGLI0BeB.pgp
Description: PGP
Joe Ciccone wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
He and Ryan are proposing the Open Publication License,
http://www.opencontent.org/openpub, for all the books. I've looked at
it and it seems to meet the standards of having a recognized license and
protecting the books. If it is the community's
El Martes, 22 de Agosto de 2006 06:13, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
He and Ryan are proposing the Open Publication License,
http://www.opencontent.org/openpub, for all the books. I've looked at
it and it seems to meet the standards of having a recognized license and
protecting the books. If it is
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Martes, 22 de Agosto de 2006 06:13, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
He and Ryan are proposing the Open Publication License,
http://www.opencontent.org/openpub, for all the books. I've looked at
it and it seems to meet the standards of having a recognized license and
protecting
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Currently, LFS ticket 1765,
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1765, suggests that LFS use
the licenses that are currently in the BLFS book. Jim, Ryan, and I have
had some off-line conversations about this and feel it is time to open
up this discussion to the
On 8/21/06, Allard Welter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need more than just the two TTF in /usr/share/font as these don't
include symbols. Try browsing maths page in wiki for instance.
Allard, could you point me to the specific page? I want to see if the
fonts I have installed provide the symbols.
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
He and Ryan are proposing the Open Publication License,
http://www.opencontent.org/openpub, for all the books. I've looked at
it and it seems to meet the standards of having a recognized license and
protecting the books. If it is the community's decision, I have no
Allard Welter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:35, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 8/21/06, Allard Welter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need more than just the two TTF in /usr/share/font as these don't
include symbols. Try browsing maths page in wiki for instance.
Allard, could you point me to the
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 02:26, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Allard Welter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:35, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 8/21/06, Allard Welter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need more than just the two TTF in /usr/share/font as these don't
include symbols. Try browsing maths page in
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Currently, LFS ticket 1765,
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1765, suggests that LFS use
the licenses that are currently in the BLFS book. Jim, Ryan, and I have
had some off-line conversations about this and feel it is time to open
up
On 8/21/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, LFS, HLFS, and Cross-LFS have the same license. This license
is home grown and has not been vetted by anyone knowledgeable in the
law. BLFS went to a dual license format some time ago using a Creative
Commons License,
Allard Welter wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space
The arrows, element signs etc. came up as cute little blocks with
numbers in them. As a physics student I'm probably a little biased, it
was kind of as an illustration.
For the original poster (too late):
If you install all X
12 matches
Mail list logo
