Re: Netcat?

2007-03-03 Thread Felix M. Palmen
* Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070302 10:31]: This would be a good candidate for the wiki right now. Why don't you [...] that would be a good place. Thanks for the hint, I added instructions there. Now what should I do with the patch? For now, i put a link to my own host in the

Re: Netcat?

2007-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Felix M. Palmen wrote: * Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070302 10:31]: This would be a good candidate for the wiki right now. Why don't you [...] that would be a good place. Thanks for the hint, I added instructions there. Now what should I do with the patch? For now, i put a link to my

Re: Netcat?

2007-03-03 Thread Felix M. Palmen
* Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070303 10:23]: Did you see the button Attach file next to the Edit this page ? The obvious answer is 'no'. Maybe it was to simple, sorry :o -- Felix M. Palmen (Zirias) \ -PGP- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon web: http://zirias.ath.cx/ \ http

Re: compressdoc with bad man page directory name

2007-03-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/2/07, rfc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you give compressdoc a bad man page directory name, it recursively compresses (and chmod's) the files in the current working directory. no, i wasn't in / at the time ... B-) here is my (minimally tested) workaround: --- /usr/sbin/compressdoc.old

Re: compressdoc with bad man page directory name

2007-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan Nicholson wrote: Bruce, would it be possible to move compressdoc into the auxfiles section of the repo so we can get it under version control? I can't recall the process we took to get the wget files for Xorg-7 in there. IIRC, we have to fix up the render script on Anduin and tell Justin

new package: ksh

2007-03-03 Thread DJ Lucas
Hey guys. A couple of quick questions. The new JDK build want's ksh, so it'll have to be added to BLFS. Problem is, it requires several other packages from ATT's open-ast project for the build of ksh only. I haven't looked into it too deeply (I'm seeking community approval for the

Re: compressdoc with bad man page directory name

2007-03-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/3/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: Bruce, would it be possible to move compressdoc into the auxfiles section of the repo so we can get it under version control? I can't recall the process we took to get the wget files for Xorg-7 in there. IIRC, we have

Re: new package: ksh

2007-03-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/3/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys. A couple of quick questions. The new JDK build want's ksh, so it'll have to be added to BLFS. Problem is, it requires several other packages from ATT's open-ast project for the build of ksh only. I haven't looked into it too deeply (I'm

Re: new package: ksh

2007-03-03 Thread DJ Lucas
Dan Nicholson wrote: I have no problem rolling them into one package. I'd kind of prefer that we pull all the downloads from upstream, but if it's too big of a PITA, then whatever. Looking at the fedora spec, it looks like they unpack all the tarballs and then just do `./bin/package read' then

Re: new package: ksh

2007-03-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/3/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: I have no problem rolling them into one package. I'd kind of prefer that we pull all the downloads from upstream, but if it's too big of a PITA, then whatever. Looking at the fedora spec, it looks like they unpack all the

Re: new package: ksh

2007-03-03 Thread DJ Lucas
Dan Nicholson wrote: I actually started reading after I wrote that email. Let's try to use ATT's unless it's a huge pain. That pdksh is from 1999, and with the limitations... I wouldn't bother unless you're stuck. JDK in 12 SBU?! I may actually try to build it now. How did that happen?

Re: compressdoc with bad man page directory name

2007-03-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 3/3/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: Bruce, would it be possible to move compressdoc into the auxfiles section of the repo so we can get it under version control? I can't recall the process we took to get the wget files for Xorg-7 in

Re: new package: ksh

2007-03-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/3/07, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: JDK in 12 SBU?! I may actually try to build it now. How did that happen? :-) JDK-6.0 (1.6.0_01). It was only 128 minutes on LFS-6.2 with 7:47 SBU time. It's now 93 minutes after pulling debug and fastdebug targets and