2008/2/24, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Robert Daniels wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008 05:29:29 am Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
While I see no reason why this shouldn't work for LFS (because LFS
sets $QTDIR unconditionally), I must say that this is not how big
distros like Debian
Alonso Graterol wrote:
Strange thing is that prior to floppy subsection the cgi one was
compiled OK using the same -lkio call. I don't understand why it is
able to find it once but not twice.
I tried setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/kde/lib and also
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/kde/lib/kde3 but error
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
pam_xauth — PAM module to forward xauth keys between users
Is it possible to compile it in such a way that it thinks that the xauth
command exists in the proper place,
On Mon, Feb 25, at 05:58 Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
pam_xauth — PAM module to forward xauth keys between users
Is it possible to compile it in such a way that it thinks
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, at 05:58 Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, DJ Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
pam_xauth — PAM module to forward xauth
On Mon, Feb 25, at 06:35 Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'd prefer if the explanation was changed a little bit so the emphasis
is that this is only the default path and that you can set it later
with XAuthLocation. Something like:
--with-xauth=/usr/bin/xauth: Set the default location for the xauth
Hello Everyone,
It has recently been suggested to me that the LFS LiveCD project be
killed. The main arguments for this are, essentially:
1) It is currently unmaintained
2) It removes the essential prerequisite of being able to configure a
Linux system
3) It leads to less testing from other
2008/2/25, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alonso Graterol wrote:
Strange thing is that prior to floppy subsection the cgi one was
compiled OK using the same -lkio call. I don't understand why it is
able to find it once but not twice.
I tried setting
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15:26 pm Alonso Graterol wrote:
2008/2/25, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alonso Graterol wrote:
Strange thing is that prior to floppy subsection the cgi one was
compiled OK using the same -lkio call. I don't understand why
it is able to find
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello Everyone,
It has recently been suggested to me that the LFS LiveCD project be
killed. The main arguments for this are, essentially:
1) It is currently unmaintained
2) It removes the essential prerequisite of being able to configure a
Linux system
3) It
2008/2/25, Robert Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15:26 pm Alonso Graterol wrote:
2008/2/25, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alonso Graterol wrote:
Strange thing is that prior to floppy subsection the cgi one was
compiled OK using the same
Hugo Grauls wrote:
Without the LiveCD I would never have been able to get LFS6.2 up and
running. Biggest worry is to have the right basic tools at hand to build
from scratch, i.e. the adequate releases of GCC, linker, header files
etc ...
Knowing what software to install is one of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
