Update is complete, save for the index entries in the app, driver, font,
lib, and proto sections. I ran out of time for them (I may still get it
tonight, if not, Friday, but not much has changed). Otherwise, it's
done. Let me know if you find any problems.
-- DJ
--
This message has been scan
On 11-06-2012 13:09, Andrew Benton wrote:> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
>>
>> Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch.
>
> Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake).
>
> Good news everyone, it seems that the pa
On 06/08/2012 01:21 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I was able to build and test openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>
> I used:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> export DISPLAY=:20
> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac&
> echo $!> Xvfb.pid
> make jt
On 06/11/2012 01:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test
>> openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
>>> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>>>
>>> I used:
>>>
>>> #!/bin/bash
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:36:00 +0100
> a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
>
>> Author: andy
>> Added DVB Apps 2012-06-10
>>
>> + > +"http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~andy/dvb-apps-2012-06-10.tar.xz";>
>
> DVB Apps are only available using Mercurial so I've made a tarball.
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test
> openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm
>> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>>
>> I used:
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> export DISPLAY=:20
>> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x2
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:46:44 +0100
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> after the link failed again this morning, It is really broken:
>>
>> Broken link:
>>
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.diff
>>
>> Good link:
>>
>> http:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:24:56 +0100
"Armin K." wrote:
>
> Hm, maybe this was already mentioned somewhere, but I am curious. Is
> there any good reason why BLFS instructions use installer method for
> Mozilla products? What was wrong with make install? IIRC, that was used
> for quite long time,
On 06/11/2012 06:09 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
>>
>> Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch.
>
> Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake).
>
> Good news everyone, it seems that the p
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch.
Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake).
Good news everyone, it seems that the patch has been accepted upstream
and will be committed tom
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:36:00 +0100
a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: andy
> Added DVB Apps 2012-06-10
>
> + +"http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~andy/dvb-apps-2012-06-10.tar.xz";>
DVB Apps are only available using Mercurial so I've made a tarball.
Bruce, could you put it in a more s
On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test openjdk.
The results are OK, but I'm
> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
>
> I used:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> export DISPLAY=:20
> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac&
> echo $!> Xvfb.pid
> make jt
On 11-06-2012 08:28, Andrew Benton wrote:> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:15:34 +0100
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
>> I can't get on the LFS server from work to check, but my immediate thought
>> on this is that patch is
>> incorrectly named. package-manifest should be package_manifest in its name.
>
>
On 11-06-2012 08:13, Matthew Burgess wrote:> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:11:12
+0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
>> Yes, you're right, the patch isn't being copied across into
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn
>> I'm not seeing any error emails about missing patches on the BLFS Book
>> l
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:15:34 +0100
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I can't get on the LFS server from work to check, but my immediate thought on
> this is that patch is
> incorrectly named. package-manifest should be package_manifest in its name.
I think it was the extension. When I originally create
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:11:12 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Yes, you're right, the patch isn't being copied across into
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn
> I'm not seeing any error emails about missing patches on the BLFS Book
> list. I don't know why the script is failing.
I can
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:46:44 +0100
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> after the link failed again this morning, It is really broken:
>
> Broken link:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.diff
>
> Good link:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patch
--- Em sáb, 9/6/12, Andrew Benton escreveu:
> De: Andrew Benton
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .
> introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
> Para: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
> Data: Sábado, 9 de Junho de 2012, 19:30
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:42:
18 matches
Mail list logo
