Re: [blfs-dev] SBUs - was Re: #3982: Firefox-23.0.1/Xulrunner-23.0.1

2013-08-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > This is prompted by my LFS-7.4 build on i686. The host was LFS-7.2 > and a single-threaded initial SBU was 78.392 seconds (whoot! fast!). > But one of the first things I do on a new system is remove /tools, > recreate an empty /tools, and run the SBU commands as root. Usual

[blfs-dev] SBUs - was Re: #3982: Firefox-23.0.1/Xulrunner-23.0.1

2013-08-21 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 01:49:17PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > All 5 VMs finished. They run with 4 CPU's, are i686. Two, as I said > before, 1GB RAM, running in other host, 3 have 1.5GB, running on this > host that have many other things, including FF and TB, running as well. > > In th

Re: [blfs-dev] Two difficulties (one in all versions)

2013-08-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Did not know if sending here, to lfs -dev or to blfs -support. > > 1. Happened with lfs-7.2,7.3 (both svn) and now with 7.4-rc1. > > Long ago, I reported that each time I tried to chroot in LFS7.2 (LFS7.1 > as host), after logout and umount, had to reboot the system, b

[blfs-dev] Two difficulties (one in all versions)

2013-08-21 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Did not know if sending here, to lfs -dev or to blfs -support. 1. Happened with lfs-7.2,7.3 (both svn) and now with 7.4-rc1. Long ago, I reported that each time I tried to chroot in LFS7.2 (LFS7.1 as host), after logout and umount, had to reboot the system, because I could not get a terminal anym