Em 07-03-2014 17:40, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:22:52PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> It is clear that my rebuild of the docs was very different from
>> Fernando's. At the moment I'm concentrating on rebuilding
>> everything in chroot, just in case there is any breakage from
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I find "du" more accurate, although more tome consuming,
Yes, that's why I went ot df.
so have to to
> mark some instants to avoid it from interfering in the timings.
>
> On example is that df will include the log size, perhaps you think it is
> relevant.
For me th
Em 06-03-2014 15:22, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:36:02PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 06-03-2014 13:36, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>>>
>>>So build size is measured as df_after - df_before. The issue to note
>>> is that there is activity during the build that adds
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:36:02PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 06-03-2014 13:36, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> >
> >So build size is measured as df_after - df_before. The issue to note
> > is that there is activity during the build that adds or deletes space on
> > /tmp, the size will
Em 06-03-2014 13:36, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> There is a question in the tickets about statistics. This is how I do
> it. I have a script for each package that measures time and size.
>
> I build packages in /tmp, but really could be anywhere.
>
> First measure the free disk space:
>
> before=
There is a question in the tickets about statistics. This is how I do
it. I have a script for each package that measures time and size.
I build packages in /tmp, but really could be anywhere.
First measure the free disk space:
before=`df -k /tmp | grep / | sed -e "s/ \{2,\}/ /g" | cut -d' ' -
