Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 12/01/06 00:20 CST:
This is a pitiful, and dying server. There is no reason that Gerard
can't put the new hardware on line other than he just doesn't want to,
or really had no intentions on doing it in the first place.
My apologies for my comments. I am/was
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 11/22/06 08:59 CST:
On 11/20/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe this Belgarath
upgrade is going to happen, and the project is completely
dying because of it.
FWIW, Gerard targetted the Thanksgiving weekend as the time when he
Matthew Burgess wrote:
I also have privs. However, I don't have any monitoring daemons
available. I know nagios used to run and provide reports to system
admins, but I've not seen any recently. I think it only monitored http
and smtp. If I notice any services are down (usually limited to
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I replied to this thread earlier and my message (due to constraints on
my work network) was routed through my gmail account - anyway, my
message was rejected by someone with moderator privs, and no reason was
given as to why it was rejected and not accepted.
That would
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
That would be me. I would have let it through if I noticed it, but I
didn't see it among the 100+ spam messages. Sorry.
No problem. I should have realized that there would have been a lot of
trapped spam messages in addition to mine. Sorry if I sounded critical.
--
JH
On 11/20/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I'm guilty as much as anyone for lack of contribution
recently, though I *have* tried a couple of times to get
something done, but Belgarath ended up being down, or I could
not send mail, or whatever. I don't believe this Belgarath
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 11/20/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is someone with appropriate rights that can monitor
Belgarath and restart services as they crash (and perhaps kill
all the services that we *really* don't need), perhaps we could
get some contribution going.
