Randy McMurchy wrote:
The Oldfellow wrote these words on 06/05/05 06:07 CST:
TheOldFellow wrote:
What's the policy on new packages in the BLFS book?
Hi Richard,
It looks good. I considered adding Bluefish to the book a long time
ago, but since the dependencies were straightforward,
Randy McMurchy wrote:
So, that said, when I considered the book already provides Vim,
Joe, Nano, Emacs, Kedit and Gedit, I thought it may be overkill to
add another text editor.
You may be right. There's also sed and ed, of course :-)
As you say, Bruce has the final say.
And I won't be
The Oldfellow wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote:
What's the policy on new packages in the BLFS book?
For instance I discovered an editor, called Bluefish, and introduced a
number of LFSers to it, with good reports. BLFS doesn't have a tabbed
desktop-independent X-windows editor designed for markup
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The Oldfellow wrote:
TheOldFellow wrote:
What's the policy on new packages in the BLFS book?
For instance I discovered an editor, called Bluefish, and introduced a
number of LFSers to it, with good reports. BLFS doesn't have a tabbed
desktop-independent X-windows editor
