Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-10 Thread Fernando
Em 09-05-2013 17:25, Armin K. escreveu: On 05/09/2013 04:14 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I used in 4.0.2, not yet in 4.0.3. Forwarded another message from Ken to the list, with the patches. []s, Fernando The build finished (after 4:30 hours, DOH!) and everything appears to work

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-10 Thread Armin K.
On 05/11/2013 01:31 AM, Fernando wrote: Em 09-05-2013 17:25, Armin K. escreveu: On 05/09/2013 04:14 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I used in 4.0.2, not yet in 4.0.3. Forwarded another message from Ken to the list, with the patches. []s, Fernando The build finished (after 4:30 hours,

[blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-09 Thread Armin K.
Hi, Someone mentioned he had a patch for LibreOffice to use system installed version of Boost. I am in process of upgrading LibreOffice to 4.0.3 and would like to include the patch if it's possible. Whoever it was, please send it or add it into patch repository. Thanks. -- http

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-09 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 9/5/13, Armin K. escreveu: De: Armin K. Assunto: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost Para: BLFS Development List Data: Quinta-feira, 9 de Maio de 2013, 10:50 Hi, Someone mentioned he had a patch for LibreOffice to use system installed version of Boost. I am in process

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-09 Thread Armin K.
On 05/09/2013 04:14 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I used in 4.0.2, not yet in 4.0.3. Forwarded another message from Ken to the list, with the patches. []s, Fernando The build finished (after 4:30 hours, DOH!) and everything appears to work when I use the patches. Thanks, I commited the

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice and System Boost

2013-05-09 Thread Ken Moffat
!) and everything appears to work when I use the patches. Thanks, I commited the changes to the book. Sorry, I didn't look at my blfs mbox earlier. Meanwhile, I've reduced my build so that only LO uses boost - and for that I'm happy to go with the shipped version (4.0.2 built fine with LFS from 2012-04-29

Re: Boost building

2011-03-13 Thread Vladislav Kuzkokov
Hi everyone, As gzip and bzip2 are installed both in chap 6 of LFS, they should be available on every system in usual locations. That's part of my problem. Those instructions don't have to work out of LFS context. I think either the libs are available, then they should be found without any

Re: Boost building

2011-03-13 Thread Tobias Gasser
Vladislav Kuzkokov schrieb: Hi everyone, As gzip and bzip2 are installed both in chap 6 of LFS, they should be available on every system in usual locations. That's part of my problem. Those instructions don't have to work out of LFS context. it's *B*LFS, thus LFS is required. I think

Re: Boost building

2011-03-12 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:43:48 +0600 Vladislav Kuzkokov vladislav.kuzko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, In order to keep LFS/BLFS the major source of concise building instructions. Boost.IOStreams optionally requires zlib and libbz2. Alternatively you can use ./bjam -sNO_ZLIB=1

Boost building

2011-03-11 Thread Vladislav Kuzkokov
/1_45_0/libs/iostreams/doc/installation.html Also, Boost doesn't seem to create libboost.{so,a} (by default at least). It's more like libboost_*.{so,a} Best regards, Vladislav -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe

Re: Boost building

2011-03-11 Thread William Immendorf
/1_45_0/libs/iostreams/doc/installation.html It's pretty much a moot point as unless you were building Boost in the earlier parts of LFS, it dosen't matter that much. Also, Boost doesn't seem to create libboost.{so,a} (by default at least). It's more like libboost_*.{so,a} This is normal, because

Re: Boost building

2011-03-11 Thread Stuart Stegall
Boost library naming is slightly more complicated that even that ... http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_0/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming Thanks, Stuart -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe

Re: Boost building

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Trepl
Hi Vladislav, Boost.IOStreams optionally requires zlib and libbz2. Alternatively you can use ./bjam -sNO_ZLIB=1 -sNO_BZIP2=1 Otherwise compiling IOStreams fails. That's better explained at http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/libs/iostreams/doc/installation.html hmmm, the boost page you

Boost

2011-02-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs
The url in the book is wrong: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/boost/boost_1_45.tar.bz2 should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/boost/boost_1_45_0.tar.bz2 I fixed that. The bigger problem IMO, is the description: Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries. What does

Re: Boost

2010-05-11 Thread David Jensen
On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:24:28 +0100 Ken Moffat zarniwhoo...@googlemail.com wrote: On 10 May 2010 22:23, David Jensen djensen...@windstrean.net wrote: I didn't see a track ticket for Boost.  I could open one and attach a patch, but only if anyone is interested in adding it. Works for me

Re: Boost

2010-05-11 Thread Ken Moffat
in /usr/include/boost, libs in /usr/lib. Sorry, I managed to misread it as 'install bjam'  I'm in the happy position of no longer needing boost - I gave up on kde4, but retained boost for gnash, and then youtube changes meant gnash stopped working.  What do you build that requires boost

Boost

2010-05-10 Thread David Jensen
I didn't see a track ticket for Boost. I could open one and attach a patch, but only if anyone is interested in adding it. Works for me boost_1_43_0: {{{ ./bootstrap.sh --prefix=/usr ./bjam ./bjam install # install the new bjam install -v bjam /usr/bin # install the html docs bdocdir=/usr