Re: OpenOffice bug in BZ

2005-04-27 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > > >>http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40937 >> > > > And yes the doublefree patch works. But I forgot to update the build > size and times...so guess what?!?! Yes another complete @$%^%&$& build. > ;-) Update coming soon. Robert, you might

Re: OpenOffice bug in BZ

2005-04-26 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas wrote: > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40937 > And yes the doublefree patch works. But I forgot to update the build size and times...so guess what?!?! Yes another complete @$%^%&$& build. ;-) Update coming soon. Robert, you might want to put that patch in place

Re: OpenOffice bug in BZ

2005-04-26 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > This question mostly directed to DJ, and FYI for everyone else. > > Is http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090 still > a valid bug, or can this one be closed out? > Dang it! Well now I remember and that was it. The last time this was brou

OpenOffice bug in BZ

2005-04-26 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, This question mostly directed to DJ, and FYI for everyone else. Is http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090 still a valid bug, or can this one be closed out? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release versio