On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
If you really want to be helpful, why don't you see if the current commands
work
with the new package. A review of the *key* changes in your own words would be
helpful. For instance, it looks like they added a
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:06:01 -0600, William Immendorf
will.immend...@gmail.com wrote:
I tend to be impatient, however. So keep that in mind.
And we tend to ignore impatient people who are unwilling/unable to help
contribute
to the books or support thereof. So keep that in mind.
Honestly,
And now, given that, I hereby promise not to feed the troll anymore.
I am not a troll, BTW. I am a austic guy.
But I will still help.
William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
New version of program.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Are you ignoring me? There is a new version of OpenSSH 5.2p1, and BLFS
should upgrade to it.
William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
William Immendorf wrote:
Are you ignoring me? There is a new version of OpenSSH 5.2p1, and BLFS
should upgrade to it.
No, we are not ignoring the fact that there is a new OpenSSH version. Most of
us have a few other things to do, like a job, and you shouldn't expect to see a
response in less
