Re: Remaining 6.1 bugs

2005-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: Bruce, I take it you're going to ignore 1485 that I raised yesterday ? And still on the subject of security, it appears that fetchmail is now being maintained from http://fetchmail.berlios.de who have a 6.2.5.2 release to address CAN-2005-2335. See e.g.

Re: Remaining 6.1 bugs

2005-07-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: Bruce, I take it you're going to ignore 1485 that I raised yesterday ? And still on the subject of security, it appears that fetchmail is now being maintained from http://fetchmail.berlios.de who have a 6.2.5.2 release to

Re: Remaining 6.1 bugs

2005-07-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 07/30/05 16:17 CST: But it rather looks as if it may have been forked (esr's site still shows 6.2.0 as latest, but the URI in my previous post talks of development versions as well as the stable, and mentions a mailing list), which raises the question of

Re: Remaining 6.1 bugs

2005-07-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote: It's not a fork. Just new maintainership. Fetchmail was taken over in 1996 by Eric Raymond. Last year however, a new group of guys took over. It appears that the Berlios site is now the official site for Fetchmail. Thanks, Randy. I'd assumed

Re: Remaining 6.1 bugs

2005-07-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: fetchmail-6.2.5.2 also works unchanged with the book's instructions. Guidance on whether to BZ it, and use of BZ if I'm doing it wrong (for 6.1) will still be appreciated. Go ahead adn BZ it. The priority for a simple version