Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/18/06 11:48 CST:
Before I do this, I am soliciting comments to see if there is anything
I'm overlooking or any reason not to restrict the BLFS lists.
Comments?
Bad move, at least in my opinion. This effectively eliminates using
the GMane news mechanism
On 4/18/06, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with SPAM on the BLFS lists. I am proposing that we
'close' the lists to non-subscribed members. The main issue is that
list members who post from multiple email accounts will have to
subscribe for each account.
Non-member
El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 18:48, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Non-member email would go to /dev/null
I could to agree if instead to /dev/null that mails are keep awaiting
moderator approval.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:23:01PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 18:48, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Non-member email would go to /dev/null
I could to agree if instead to /dev/null that mails are keep awaiting
moderator approval.
In principle I agree. In practice
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 18:48, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Non-member email would go to /dev/null
I could to agree if instead to /dev/null that mails are keep awaiting
moderator approval.
Would you like to be the moderator?
-- Bruce
--
We have a problem with SPAM on the BLFS lists. I am proposing that we
'close' the lists to non-subscribed members. The main issue is that
list members who post from multiple email accounts will have to
subscribe for each account.
Non-member email would go to /dev/null
Before I do this, I am
El Martes, 18 de Abril de 2006 19:33, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
Would you like to be the moderator?
No problem, but could be better if all editors are moderators.
If after some days the number of retained mails/day is excessive, we can then
to do the /dev/null redirection.
That could be valid
Bruce Dubbs schrieb:
Non-member email would go to /dev/null
Good idea.
regards
Alfred
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:48 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
We have a problem with SPAM on the BLFS lists. I am proposing that we
'close' the lists to non-subscribed members. The main issue is that
list members who post from multiple email accounts will have to
subscribe for each account.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:48:08 -0500
Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with SPAM on the BLFS lists. I am proposing that we
'close' the lists to non-subscribed members. The main issue is that
list members who post from multiple email accounts will have to
subscribe for
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
We have a problem with SPAM on the BLFS lists. I am proposing that we
'close' the lists to non-subscribed members. The main issue is that
list members who post from multiple email accounts will have to
subscribe for each account.
Non-member email
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:55:41PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
Please don't do this. It creates a hostile, insular impression if a
mailing list is closed to people who aren't subscribed.
Most lists are subscriber-only. And there is no way to please everyone.
Some will love it, some will
Archaic wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:55:41PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
Please don't do this. It creates a hostile, insular impression if a
mailing list is closed to people who aren't subscribed.
Most lists are subscriber-only. And there is no way to please everyone.
Some will love
13 matches
Mail list logo
