On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:28:31PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
After 6.2? It can be corrected in BLFS now if you wanted to get it to
the default root:root in LFS...or is this dependent on the group being
removed in LFS or something else?
After 6.2, there will likely be many changes to udev to
Archaic wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:25:03AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
Looks like the devices are handled in 25-lfs.rules now...including
ownership by the audio group. Shouldn't that become simply:
That is a left over that will be removed after 6.2.
After 6.2? It can be corrected in
Tony Kuneck wrote:
Hi all,
_First_ issue: In the current dev book svn-20060519, there is this section:
Snip currently broken alsa rules
Looks like the devices are handled in 25-lfs.rules now...including
ownership by the audio group. Shouldn't that become simply:
cat
Tony Kuneck wrote:
Hi all,
_First_ issue: In the current dev book svn-20060519, there is this section:
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/15-alsa.rules EOF
# Give the audio group ownership of sound devices
SUBSYSTEM==sound, GROUP=audio
SUBSYSTEM==snd, GROUP=audio
# ALSA Devices
# When a
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:25:03AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
Looks like the devices are handled in 25-lfs.rules now...including
ownership by the audio group. Shouldn't that become simply:
That is a left over that will be removed after 6.2.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security
Hi all,
_First_ issue: In the current dev book svn-20060519, there is this section:
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/15-alsa.rules EOF
# Give the audio group ownership of sound devices
SUBSYSTEM==sound, GROUP=audio
SUBSYSTEM==snd, GROUP=audio
# ALSA Devices
# When a sound device is
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:56:00PM -0400, Tony Kuneck wrote:
There should be double == for lines 8 thru 12, KERNEL==. In udev
Correct.
_Secondly_: /usr may not be mounted when udev deals with this action,
and so /usr/sbin/alsactl restore [0-9]* does not get called, (which is
BLFS svn
