Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-29 Thread John Gnew
Joe Ciccone wrote: I attached a patch, created from svn diff, that creates an xchat page. The only thing I wasn't able to provide is how many SBU's the build takes. I got 0.327 SBUs when I installed XChat. John -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Joe Ciccone
I attached a patch, created from svn diff, that creates an xchat page. The only thing I wasn't able to provide is how many SBU's the build takes. Index: basicnet/mailnews/xchat.xml === --- basicnet/mailnews/xchat.xml (revision 0) +++

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/27/06, Joe Ciccone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: line 47: static const struct defaultserver def[] = { {Linux From Scratch, 0}, {0, irc.linuxfromscratch.org}, {2600net, 0}, {0, irc.2600.net}, Probably, (assuming those are tabs and not spaces) sed

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Randy McMurchy wrote: However, I think patching the sources to move one server ahead of another is something we probably don't want to do. This to me seems sort of something a user needs to do, or if it can't be done without patching/sedding, then it probably doesn't need to be done. I think

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/27/06, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: To me it would be no different than us patching a browser to make LFS the default home page. And I know that wouldn't really be kosher. Heh, good idea! RedHat does it... -- Dan --

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:28 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: RedHat does it... At this point, because of the lack of clarity to distinguish between what is just playing around and what is actually being said in seriousness, we should probably all just say that everyone has just been clowning

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/27/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:28 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: RedHat does it... What a distro does (Redhat) is their business. LFS is all about 'Your distro, Your rules'. Just fooling around. Although, I would not have a problem if that sed

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Randy McMurchy wrote: And to me, that doesn't include forcing folks to have a default *anything*, other than what the package maintainer does. In all seriousness, of course, you're right. Anything of that sort is out of the question for the book. -- JH --

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:28 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: RedHat does it... At this point, because of the lack of clarity to distinguish between what is just playing around and what is actually being said in seriousness, we should probably all just say that everyone

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Joe Ciccone
Randy McMurchy wrote: However, I think patching the sources to move one server ahead of another is something we probably don't want to do. This to me seems sort of something a user needs to do, or if it can't be done without patching/sedding, then it probably doesn't need to be done. To me

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Joe Ciccone
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I may be sounding like a broken record, but it wouldn't be unreasonable to show users how to do this in the wiki. That works for me. If you've ever had to use xchat you'd know that it is very easy to add a server at runtime also. I was just shooting the idea out. --

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/27/06, Joe Ciccone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Run the following command if you want to add the Linux From Scratch IRC server into the default list of servers: sed -i '/MagicStar/{ i \\t{Linux From Scratch, 0}, i \\t{0, irc.linuxfromscratch.org}, i }' src/common/servlist.c

Re: X-chat 2.6.2

2006-03-27 Thread Randy McMurchy
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 19:44 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Also being serious I would point out that knowing how to set these things up can be an interesting thing to know. I don't see it belonging in BLFS however. I wouldn't see an issue with a paragraph in the configuration section of the BLFS