On 3/18/07, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 11:58 CST:
Sometimes developers will update their program and not update their test
suites and have some tests become invalid. I wonder if this is the case
here.
Not sure. But what I'm looking
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/18/07, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 11:58 CST:
Sometimes developers will update their program and not update their test
suites and have some tests become invalid. I wonder if this is the case
here.
Not sure. But
On 3/19/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Can't say that I run the testsuite myself usually. However, I do read
the cairo list archives pretty often. The testsuite is a very well
exercised part of their development process and I think it should pass
all tests
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/19/07 17:18 CST:
This is probably a bug in their packaging, but I'd be interested to
know if the test failures are associated with this. Actually, this
looks like it's fixed to pass -fno-strict-aliasing correctly, but
using the default CFLAGS would still
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to update the book with the current GLib, cairo, GTK+,
pango and ATK stack, but I'm sort of stuck with what to do about
cairo. The test suite does not behave properly. This is new to this
version. Up till now I've always had cairo pass all the tests.
TheOldFellow wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to update the book with the current GLib, cairo, GTK+,
pango and ATK stack, but I'm sort of stuck with what to do about
cairo. The test suite does not behave properly. This is new to this
version. Up till now I've always had cairo
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 11:58 CST:
Sometimes developers will update their program and not update their test
suites and have some tests become invalid. I wonder if this is the case
here.
Not sure. But what I'm looking for is someone to verify that the
tests fail for them as
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 03/18/07 12:16 CST:
Not sure. But what I'm looking for is someone to verify that the
tests fail for them as well. I can't determine if it is the package,
or my installation of it.
I forgot about David's message that says the tests fail for him
as well.
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 12:48 CST:
82 of 121 tests failed
Do you have a 'gs' binary installed in your path? I had about that
many fail when there was no 'gs' in my path. Installing Ghostscript
cured about 60 of the tests.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 12:48 CST:
82 of 121 tests failed
Do you have a 'gs' binary installed in your path? I had about that
many fail when there was no 'gs' in my path. Installing Ghostscript
cured about 60 of the tests.
No, I don't have gs
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 13:07 CST:
No, I don't have gs installed. Do you want me to do that and retest?
If you want to, and that could confirm the failures. You probably
want to ensure that you have GLib-2.12.11 installed as well, as
that is what the book will have in just a
On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:47, Randy McMurchy wrote:
I always install ESPGS as it provides
CUPS support and seems to be better maintained.
That's what I assumed, from the frequency of releases. However, I'm not
certain that it's going to have any more releases at all after reading
Matthew Burgess wrote:
On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:47, Randy McMurchy wrote:
I always install ESPGS as it provides
CUPS support and seems to be better maintained.
That's what I assumed, from the frequency of releases. However, I'm not
certain that it's going to have any more releases at
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 03/18/07 13:57 CST:
That's what I assumed, from the frequency of releases. However, I'm not
certain that it's going to have any more releases at all after reading
http://www.cups.org/espgs/articles.php?L449
Does anyone know anything more about the
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/18/07 14:06 CST:
I;d have to take a look at the contents of GPL Ghostscript 8.54, but if
it supports CUPS, we should probably use that in BLFS as the only
version if Ghostscript.
Eventually, yes. And Ghostscript is now at 8.56, with this release
just
Hi all,
I'd like to update the book with the current GLib, cairo, GTK+,
pango and ATK stack, but I'm sort of stuck with what to do about
cairo. The test suite does not behave properly. This is new to this
version. Up till now I've always had cairo pass all the tests.
First, I had the Glitz
16 matches
Mail list logo
