Re: gtk+-2.8 tombstone

2007-03-08 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/7/07, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And in response to a question later in the thread, we will skip GNOME-2.16.1 and move straight to 2.18. This probably requires updating HAL as well (not sure). We'll need to create some sort of plan on who will do what in what timeframe. I

gtk+-2.8 tombstone

2007-03-07 Thread David Jensen
Until we update glib, cairo, atk, pango and gtk everything is behind the 8-ball. Lets upgrade them and let stuff be broke till we get there. This is supposed to be unstable not stuck! What say? --- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: gtk+-2.8 tombstone

2007-03-07 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/7/07, David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until we update glib, cairo, atk, pango and gtk everything is behind the 8-ball. Lets upgrade them and let stuff be broke till we get there. This is supposed to be unstable not stuck! What say? I've got no problems with that. Cairo-1.4.0 just

Re: gtk+-2.8 tombstone

2007-03-07 Thread David Jensen
Dan Nicholson wrote: I've got no problems with that. Cairo-1.4.0 just came out and it's supposed to be hot stuff. I would certainly wait for Randy to chime in, though. I saw that, it says an expanded API. I expect no-one has released anything using that yet. I see gnome 2.18.0 is due out

Re: gtk+-2.8 tombstone

2007-03-07 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 3/7/07, David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Nicholson wrote: I've got no problems with that. Cairo-1.4.0 just came out and it's supposed to be hot stuff. I would certainly wait for Randy to chime in, though. I saw that, it says an expanded API. I expect no-one has released