Re: kde gl screensavers

2005-04-17 Thread Jeremy Utley
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Jeremy Utley wrote: Having the Mesa 3d libs installed will break hardware 3D-rendering always - whether it be DRI-based, NVIDIA drivers, or ATI's FireGL drivers. People will be limited to software 3d rendering. Thanks Jeremy. I can confirm that with the mesa

Re: kde gl screensavers

2005-04-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Utley wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Jeremy Utley wrote: Having the Mesa 3d libs installed will break hardware 3D-rendering always - whether it be DRI-based, NVIDIA drivers, or ATI's FireGL drivers. People will be limited to software 3d rendering. Thanks Jeremy. I can confirm that with

NVidia drivers (was Re: kde gl screensavers)

2005-04-17 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I figured out what happened. I installed the Nvidia binary drivers. It overwrote: Is it a good idea to add manual installation of those NVidia drivers (and possibly fglrx, I can provide instructions) to the book, so that future readers don't step onto this problem? --

Re: kde gl screensavers

2005-04-16 Thread Igor Zivkovic
[I'm sorry if this comes as a duplicate message as I'm not sure about the current status of the mail/news gateway and my posts don't seem to appear on the mailing lists.] Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Re: kde gl screensavers

2005-04-16 Thread Jeremy Utley
Bruce Dubbs wrote: OK. I can work with that. Right now the issue is whether to mention mesa at all. I'm inclined to at least mention it. I don't know if the mesa install breaks anything else. I don't know what to test it with other than the kde screensavers. -- Bruce Having the Mesa

Re: kde gl screensavers

2005-04-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Utley wrote: Having the Mesa 3d libs installed will break hardware 3D-rendering always - whether it be DRI-based, NVIDIA drivers, or ATI's FireGL drivers. People will be limited to software 3d rendering. Thanks Jeremy. I can confirm that with the mesa libraries installed I get 635