Re: [blfs-dev] Requesting permission to fix Ruby for lchmod problems in glibc

2020-08-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 01:17:03PM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > Hi folks, > > > Since Ruby was tagged this morning, I'd like to ask for permission > to fix the issue that I just encountered. > > First, some background information. In glibc-2.32, the glibc > developers

[blfs-dev] Requesting permission to fix Ruby for lchmod problems in glibc

2020-08-17 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
Hi folks, Since Ruby was tagged this morning, I'd like to ask for permission to fix the issue that I just encountered. First, some background information. In glibc-2.32, the glibc developers implemented a wrapper for lchmod() and fchmodat() for POSIX compatibility. Unfortunately, the

Re: [blfs-dev] firefox (and js) -> rust -> llvm dependency

2020-08-17 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 01:33:49PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > I just drafted js78 page. When it was built, the building system utilized > some > LLVM tools (llvm-objdump and llvm-profdata). > > Is a rustc built with shipped LLVM providing llvm-objdump and llvm-profdata, > which

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice translations

2020-08-17 Thread Joe Locash via blfs-dev
On Aug 16, 2020 5:21 PM, "Marty Jack via blfs-dev" < blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > You do appear to be correct that the build will do without the translations tarball under --with-locales="en_US". I am fairly certain that this wasn't true in years past. The help for the

[blfs-dev] firefox (and js) -> rust -> llvm dependency

2020-08-17 Thread Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev
I just drafted js78 page. When it was built, the building system utilized some LLVM tools (llvm-objdump and llvm-profdata). Is a rustc built with shipped LLVM providing llvm-objdump and llvm-profdata, which could be used during firefox or js build? If not we should list LLVM as a firefox/js