Re: [blfs-dev] "with parallelism=4"

2020-03-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 3/16/20 11:29 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: The more I edit, the more the phrase "with parallelism=4" grates. First, I don't really think it is good English or good American. In the days when everything was CMMI it could correctly be parsed as "when using make -j4" (assuming people

[blfs-dev] "with parallelism=4"

2020-03-16 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
The more I edit, the more the phrase "with parallelism=4" grates. First, I don't really think it is good English or good American. In the days when everything was CMMI it could correctly be parsed as "when using make -j4" (assuming people weren't silly enough to do that on a machine with <4