Top posting for blind readers.
This is the first time I've seen any request to support blind readers. I
would think that the host system would handle things for LFS, but I
understand the issue for BLFS. I'll look into adding the speakup screen
reader. Building speakup from within chroot
Chris Staub wrote:
(sending again, to both lists this time)
On 04/18/2016 04:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
if uncluding mc, then its dependencies - at least glib and libffi.
libssh2 has been handy here too (for virtual sftp file system support),
though I recognize it is not even in the book :-(
Yes, of course the dependent
Julius ter Pelkwijk wrote:
Hi,
I would certainly add some "rescue-tools" in there too, like memtest and
hard drive diagnostics. A malware scanner is also handy to have (in case
someone hijacked their harddrives and encrypted everything), rsync,
ddrescue, an ntfs partition reader, maybe
dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following: [...]
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following: [...]
Sounds good!
What else?
if
