Re: [blfs-dev] Odd failure in heirloom-mailx

2017-04-11 Thread Richard Melville
On 10 April 2017 at 16:27, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:44:12PM +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > > On 9 April 2017 at 22:45, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > Ken, I'm tagging on to the end of this post, not because I have an answer > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Odd failure in heirloom-mailx

2017-04-10 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:44:12PM +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > On 9 April 2017 at 22:45, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken, I'm tagging on to the end of this post, not because I have an answer > to your issue, but because, coincidently, I'm looking at mailx at the > moment

Re: [blfs-dev] Odd failure in heirloom-mailx

2017-04-10 Thread Richard Melville
On 9 April 2017 at 22:45, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Mailx is one of those packages I always build before booting a new >> system, so that fcron can send mail to my server. The current build >> is using exactly the same scripts / versions as I used on

Re: [blfs-dev] Odd failure in heirloom-mailx

2017-04-09 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: Mailx is one of those packages I always build before booting a new system, so that fcron can send mail to my server. The current build is using exactly the same scripts / versions as I used on another machine about 4 days ago (I need a fresh, clean, system to review what I'm

[blfs-dev] Odd failure in heirloom-mailx

2017-04-09 Thread Ken Moffat
Mailx is one of those packages I always build before booting a new system, so that fcron can send mail to my server. The current build is using exactly the same scripts / versions as I used on another machine about 4 days ago (I need a fresh, clean, system to review what I'm planning re llvm-3