On 05/25/16 20:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi Bruce
On 04/18/16 22:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
If you are interested, I can
On 05/25/16 14:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I then thought how the CD/DVD paradigm is so last decade. I think it
would be much easier to produce an iso that targets a thumb drive only.
Users could then add packages as they see fit.
Comments?
-- Bruce
From a user's perspective, I definitely
Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi Bruce
On 04/18/16 22:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following:
dhcpcd
On 04/19/16 02:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
This will take me a while. I have not built a live-dd/iso before and
I'm just researching what is needed now. I do think a hint would be
appropriate right now, but if everything works out, we might want to add
something to BLFS like
> From: Tim Tassonis <st...@decentral.ch>
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:27:01 +0200
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Thinking about a new LFS Live CD/iso
>
> On 04/18/16 22:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
.
.
> - llvm, mdadm, good if used on a system where lvm/RAID is use
Hi Bruce
On 04/18/16 22:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following:
dhcpcd
wget
ssh/ssl
which
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
I have had that idea for a long time actually. I would add stuff like
pciutils, usbutils, hdparm, sg3_utils, ntfs-3g, parted, etc. to make it a
more complete
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS. It
> would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
> implementation.
>
> What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the
I've been thinking thinking about a new Live CD/Rescue CD based on LFS.
It would be much less ambitious than the old one that included an X
implementation.
What I had in mind is a base LFS system with the following:
dhcpcd
wget
ssh/ssl
which
links
screen
mc
gptfdisk
gpm
LFS HTML
LFS sources