On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:54:26PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/1/21 3:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
> > cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
> >
On 4/1/21 3:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice, or at least as supported as cmake.
As I personally don't see the
On 4/1/21 3:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice, or at least as supported as cmake.
As I personally don't see the
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:09:48PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> >
> > > However, there might be a lfs/blfs policy regarding preference for cmake
> > > that I am not aware of?
> >
> > If the upstream has a recommendation, just follow the upstream. Otherwise,
> > for
> >
On 4/1/21 11:47 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2021-04-01 10:52 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice, or at
On 2021-04-01 10:52 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
> cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
> still seems first choice, or at least as supported as cmake.
>
> As I
Hi all
I just discovered that curl apparently now also optionally supports
cmake as build system. Per official documentation however, ./configure
still seems first choice, or at least as supported as cmake.
As I personally don't see the benefits of cmake over autotools from a
builders
