Am Samstag, den 18.08.2018, 09:27 +0200 schrieb Thomas Trepl:
> Am Freitag, den 17.08.2018, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > >
> > > Rerun the tests here with "ninja check{,-clang{,-tooling}}" - not
> > > "make". I used
> > >
>
Am Freitag, den 17.08.2018, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> >
> > Rerun the tests here with "ninja check{,-clang{,-tooling}}" - not
> > "make". I used
> >
> > CC=gcc CXX=g++ \
> > cmake
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 01:17:17AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Started another run (cmake, ninja, cmake for sphinx, ninja, cmake
> for clang docs, ninja, DESTDIR and the docs, then run the tests (to
> get a better idea of extra space/time). Will also determine if
> specifying -j for the tests
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:00:39AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 11:15:06PM -0500, Brendan L wrote:
> > Not about llvm, but I agree about using cmake's ninja support. It
> > made building webkitgtk so much faster for me.
> >
>
> I meant to reply to this part of the thread:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 09:27:29PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Currently rerunning the base build (i.e. no docs) with
> hyperthreading (should be slower) and ninja -j4. It is consistently
> running at 400%, unlike the build on 4 real cores which mostly only
> ran at 100% and 200%.
>
> So, it
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Thomas Trepl wrote:
>
> Rerun the tests here with "ninja check{,-clang{,-tooling}}" - not
> "make". I used
>
> CC=gcc CXX=g++ \
> cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
> -DLLVM_ENABLE_FFI=ON \
>
Am Freitag, den 17.08.2018, 05:48 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:05:14PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/12/2018 02:28 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> > > > 6.0.1 builds.
> > >
> > > Did you also run
(going back to this earlier part of the thread after my excursions
last night and earlier today, Cc'ing Thomas in case he hasn't been
following this.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:23:45AM +0200, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 22:05 -0500 schrieb DJ Lucas:
> >
> > On 08/12/2018
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 05:48:27AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Failing Tests (11):
> AddressSanitizer-x86_64-linux :: TestCases/throw_invoke_test.cc
> AddressSanitizer-x86_64-linux-dynamic :: TestCases/throw_invoke_test.cc
> LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-x86_64
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:05:14PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2018 02:28 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
>
> > > 6.0.1 builds.
> > Did you also run the tests? This is where i struggle atm. Tests seem
> > to fail in a good
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 11:15:06PM -0500, Brendan L wrote:
> Not about llvm, but I agree about using cmake's ninja support. It
> made building webkitgtk so much faster for me.
>
I meant to reply to this part of the thread:
No problem for me with using ninja on cmake packages, but when I
last
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 22:05 -0500 schrieb DJ Lucas:
>
> On 08/12/2018 02:28 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> > > 6.0.1 builds.
> >
> > Did you also run the tests? This is where i struggle atm. Tests
> > seem
> > to fail in a good
Not about llvm, but I agree about using cmake's ninja support. It
made building webkitgtk so much faster for me.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:05 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2018 02:28 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
>>
>> Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
>
>
>>> 6.0.1
On 08/12/2018 02:28 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
6.0.1 builds.
Did you also run the tests? This is where i struggle atm. Tests seem
to fail in a good amount and finally hang.
Which tests fail? Are you building with make or ninja?
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 09:28:12AM +0200, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:27:10AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > Trying to build (all of) llvm-6.0.0 :
> > >
> > > [ 9%] Building CXX object
> > > projects/compiler-
>
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2018, 03:36 +0100 schrieb Ken Moffat:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:27:10AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Trying to build (all of) llvm-6.0.0 :
> >
> > [ 9%] Building CXX object
> > projects/compiler-
> > rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.x86_64.dir/san
> >
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 03:27:10AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Trying to build (all of) llvm-6.0.0 :
>
> [ 9%] Building CXX object
> projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.x86_64.dir/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc.o
>
Trying to build (all of) llvm-6.0.0 :
[ 9%] Building CXX object
projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.x86_64.dir/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc.o
18 matches
Mail list logo
