Re: [blfs-dev] Why is LLVM recommended for gst-plugins-bad?

2019-09-25 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On 25/09/2019 21:24, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > I tried to grep "llvm" and "LLVM" in gst-plugins-bad-1.16.1 source code tree. > All references seem related to Mac OS, nothing Linux. > Using "svn blame" shows that at a time, clang has been recommended for gst-plugins-bad "to avoid video

Re: [blfs-dev] Why is LLVM recommended for gst-plugins-bad?

2019-09-25 Thread Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev
On 2019-09-25 14:33 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > On 9/25/19 2:24 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > I tried to grep "llvm" and "LLVM" in gst-plugins-bad-1.16.1 source code > > tree. > > All references seem related to Mac OS, nothing Linux. > In gst-plugins-bad.1.14.4, when

Re: [blfs-dev] Why is LLVM recommended for gst-plugins-bad?

2019-09-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 9/25/19 2:24 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: I tried to grep "llvm" and "LLVM" in gst-plugins-bad-1.16.1 source code tree. All references seem related to Mac OS, nothing Linux. You're right. I have no reference to llvm in ,y build log. I'll remove the dependency. -- Bruce --

Re: [blfs-dev] Why is LLVM recommended for gst-plugins-bad?

2019-09-25 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
On 9/25/19 2:24 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: I tried to grep "llvm" and "LLVM" in gst-plugins-bad-1.16.1 source code tree. All references seem related to Mac OS, nothing Linux. In gst-plugins-bad.1.14.4, when autotools was still supported, LLVM was listed as a dependency in the configure