Hi,
A high percentage of lfs/blfs book-commits' patches, could be a lot
more readable - and therefore less fragile/error-prone - if the xml
tags were kept on separate lines from the code.
This would be do-able while still avoiding pitfalls like the old
'vertical-formatting' in *roff/
For
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:47:40 -0500
>
[...]
> >
> > If the original xml were formatted thus:
> >
> >
> > echo "/opt/llvm3/lib" >> /etc/ld.so.conf
> > mkdir -v build
> > cd build
>
>
akhiezer wrote:
Hi,
A high percentage of lfs/blfs book-commits' patches, could be a lot
more readable - and therefore less fragile/error-prone - if the xml
tags were kept on separate lines from the code.
This would be do-able while still avoiding pitfalls like the old
'vertical-formatting'
Ken Moffat wrote:
Now that rustc is required for firefox, I would like to suggest that
we do not automatically update it on each new release. I have noted
in the book that newer versions of firefox will probably need newer
versions of rust, but I am now suggesting that this should be proven
for
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 02:55:20PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > Mostly we drop the latest versions in all the time, except when we
> > defer updating because of too frequent releases. But arguably at
> > least kde is in a similar situation - they release frequently, we
>
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 02:55:20PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
> > >
> > > Mostly we drop the latest versions in all the time, except when we
> > > defer updating because of too frequent releases.