Re: [blfs-dev] typo : x/lib/fltk.xml
Denis MUGNIER wrote: Just a little typo, on the file x/lib/fltk.xml In addition, there are 70 other executable test progroms in the test directory that can be run individually s/progroms/programs OK. Fixed. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] ticket 5042 - gcc-4.9.0 32-bit build issues
BLFS Trac wrote: Comment (by pierre.labastie): For LO, I have seen your SOS, and I'd be happy to help, but it is a big beast I have never built before (neither on 32 nor on 64 bit), so I guess I'll first have to learn it. Furthermore, if it is a GCC error, it may be tricky to fix... Moving from trac for now. Pierre, LO builds fine on a 64-bit system. It does take a while (58 SBU at -j4 for me). It takes 5.5G build space too. See my build script and log at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lo/ We do need to try libreoffice-4.2.5.2 though. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] ticket 5042 - gcc-4.9.0 32-bit build issues
Em 20-06-2014 10:20, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: BLFS Trac wrote: Comment (by pierre.labastie): For LO, I have seen your SOS, and I'd be happy to help, but it is a big beast I have never built before (neither on 32 nor on 64 bit), so I guess I'll first have to learn it. Furthermore, if it is a GCC error, it may be tricky to fix... Moving from trac for now. Pierre, LO builds fine on a 64-bit system. It does take a while (58 SBU at -j4 for me). It takes 5.5G build space too. See my build script and log at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lo/ We do need to try libreoffice-4.2.5.2 though. -- Bruce Just seen this now. Thanks. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] ticket 5042 - gcc-4.9.0 32-bit build issues
Em 20-06-2014 10:30, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 20-06-2014 10:20, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: BLFS Trac wrote: Comment (by pierre.labastie): For LO, I have seen your SOS, and I'd be happy to help, but it is a big beast I have never built before (neither on 32 nor on 64 bit), so I guess I'll first have to learn it. Furthermore, if it is a GCC error, it may be tricky to fix... Moving from trac for now. Pierre, LO builds fine on a 64-bit system. It does take a while (58 SBU at -j4 for me). It takes 5.5G build space too. See my build script and log at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lo/ We do need to try libreoffice-4.2.5.2 though. -- Bruce Just seen this now. Thanks. There is a problem, though, Pierre does't receive post from us. So, I'm sending with cco to Pierre. After the problem is solved, I can do the long -j1 build that takes 139-143 SBU (just saw a typo 1443 SBU, will s/1443/144/) So, for solving the problem, just -jx (x as large as you wish) is good enough. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Lynx 2.8.8 in BLFS 7.5 - silent version change?
Hi The file I have just downloaded today has failed a checksum test, the actual checksum being as follows: md5sum lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 b231c2aa34dfe7ca25681ef4e55ee7e8 lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 rather than f467c043fe9a3963fc1c05f54923803f as stated in the BLFS 7.5 book. Further investigation reveals that the CHANGES file in the source root folder states that the current version is now 2014-03-09 (2.8.8rel.2) (currently the version in the Development Book), rather than the original release. The download location is still http://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.8/lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 (or the same as ftp:) David -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Lynx 2.8.8 in BLFS 7.5 - silent version change?
Em 20-06-2014 13:02, David Brodie escreveu: Hi The file I have just downloaded today has failed a checksum test, the actual checksum being as follows: md5sum lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 b231c2aa34dfe7ca25681ef4e55ee7e8 lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 rather than f467c043fe9a3963fc1c05f54923803f as stated in the BLFS 7.5 book. Further investigation reveals that the CHANGES file in the source root folder states that the current version is now 2014-03-09 (2.8.8rel.2) (currently the version in the Development Book), rather than the original release. The download location is still http://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.8/lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 (or the same as ftp:) I confirm that the above lynx2.8.8 is the same as in svn. The one in BLFS 7.5 can be found here: http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/BLFS/7.5/l/lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 and has the md5sum as in the book 7.5. New entry in the errata, perhaps? -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Lynx 2.8.8 in BLFS 7.5 - silent version change?
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 20-06-2014 13:02, David Brodie escreveu: Hi The file I have just downloaded today has failed a checksum test, the actual checksum being as follows: md5sum lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 b231c2aa34dfe7ca25681ef4e55ee7e8 lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 rather than f467c043fe9a3963fc1c05f54923803f as stated in the BLFS 7.5 book. Further investigation reveals that the CHANGES file in the source root folder states that the current version is now 2014-03-09 (2.8.8rel.2) (currently the version in the Development Book), rather than the original release. The download location is still http://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.8/lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 (or the same as ftp:) I confirm that the above lynx2.8.8 is the same as in svn. The one in BLFS 7.5 can be found here: http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/BLFS/7.5/l/lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2 and has the md5sum as in the book 7.5. New entry in the errata, perhaps? It's pretty crappy that upstream changes the underlying file for a link. lfs-7.5 assumes lynx2.8.8rel.1.tar.bz2, but the web page points to lynx2.8.8rel.2.tar.bz2. I guess they are too lazy to update the web page. We've already updated the -dev version of BLFS to point to the full filename. The upstream url for lfs-7.5 should be http://lynx.isc.org/current/lynx2.8.8rel.1.tar.bz2 There is no actual lynx2.8.8.tar.bz2. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] ticket 5042 - gcc-4.9.0 32-bit build issues
Em 20-06-2014 10:42, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 20-06-2014 10:30, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Em 20-06-2014 10:20, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: BLFS Trac wrote: Comment (by pierre.labastie): For LO, I have seen your SOS, and I'd be happy to help, but it is a big beast I have never built before (neither on 32 nor on 64 bit), so I guess I'll first have to learn it. Furthermore, if it is a GCC error, it may be tricky to fix... Moving from trac for now. Pierre, LO builds fine on a 64-bit system. It does take a while (58 SBU at -j4 for me). It takes 5.5G build space too. See my build script and log at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lo/ We do need to try libreoffice-4.2.5.2 though. Failed at the same point. Pierre, even not solving, just building it would be good enough to confirm the problem with LO, or with my system, in this case, I would need to investigate my system. In the other case, someone with x85_64 would update it and, after suggestion by Bruce, add a note that it is broken in i686. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
