Em 29-12-2015 16:17, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 28-12-2015 19:10, Ken Moffat escreveu: >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 07:27:52AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >>>> Think that as soon as the main applications are ported from KDE4. Not >>>> having used KDE other than for testing (BLFS/edition and Kubuntu/how it >>>> looks and feels), cannot pinpoint. >>>> >>> You might need to define 'main' ;-) I never used kmail since kde2, >>> nor dolphin (at all), and for sites I commonly visit (e.g. slashdot- >>> not much useful content there these days, but the weird attitudes are >>> sometimes amusing), konqueror in both 4 and 5 tended to crash. >> >> Yes, but not having used much KDE, makes it very difficult. One >> application I like and have always found the best one is in KDE: KAlarm. >> Even for KDE users, it would vary, very subjective choice. > > Personally, I cannot get along without konsole. To me it is the best > virtual terminal available. I also use okular, kruler, and ksnapshot as > well as the occasional kde game. I also occasionally use k3b. I have > built and tested kdenlive and intend to use it someday to make a podcast > about LFS. Most of these apps work fine using KF5. Some I have not yet > tried to build in that environment.
I like k3b better than brasero, but have been using the latter comfortably. Interesting the kruler. > > What I do not use is the plasma desktop. I prefer xfce for that. > > My thought is to leave KDE4 as is for the next stable BLFS release and > then immediately remove it from -dev. That gives us (and the KDE devs) > 6 months to get all the needed packages up to date. This seems a good plan. PS: I needed to stop working yesterday. Problem solved, back now. -- []s, Fernando, aka SÃsifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
