Em 14-03-2016 10:08, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Em 14-03-2016 01:00, Ken Moffat escreveu:
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance
>>> burden is tremendous and we have lots of duplication of
akhiezer wrote:
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:00:05 +
From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] terminals
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance
burden is tremendous
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 04:00:05 +
> From: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] terminals
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance
>
Em 14-03-2016 01:00, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance
>> burden is tremendous and we have lots of duplication of capabilities. When
>> it comes to terminals, we have:
>>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance
> burden is tremendous and we have lots of duplication of capabilities. When
> it comes to terminals, we have:
>
> xterm
> gnome-terminal
> xfce4-terminal
>
I would like to cut down the number of packages in BLFS. The maintenance
burden is tremendous and we have lots of duplication of capabilities.
When it comes to terminals, we have:
xterm
gnome-terminal
xfce4-terminal
lxterminal
qterminal
konsole4
konsole5
I propose that we remove konsole4 and
