Yes, I ran into this too. I installed the Xp package
(libXp-1.0.0.tar.bz2) and got past the missing library issue.
Dan
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been looking at nas and it doesn't compile properly on my system as we
> have
> defined Xorg. It is looking for libXp (-lXp) in 30 different Makefil
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been looking at nas and it doesn't compile properly on my system as we
> have
> defined Xorg. It is looking for libXp (-lXp) in 30 different Makefiles but we
> we have removed libXp.
This is because imake thinks that libXaw needs libXp. So, while the
XPLIB= workaround
Hello. On the mysql page both download links do not work, and the patch
command misspells the patch file name... using a - when a _ should be used.
robert
pgpzkwqlPDDmn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
Robert Connolly wrote:
> Hello. On the mysql page both download links do not work, and the patch
> command misspells the patch file name... using a - when a _ should be used.
OK, the patch command has been fixed and I updated the master server to put the
proper links into the svn portion of the
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I've been looking at nas and it doesn't compile properly on my system as we
>> have
>> defined Xorg. It is looking for libXp (-lXp) in 30 different Makefiles but
>> we
>> we have removed libXp.
>
> This is because imake thinks that libXaw ne
2009/1/3 Bruce Dubbs :
> Thanks Alex. As I look at nas, I don't think that the change above will do
> anything for nas because it is shipped with pre made Makefiles. They are not
> regenerated. It would appear that my XPLIB= workaround is the most pragmatic
> solution for now.
Yes.
> From you
I would like to propose a change to the organization of Multimedia Libraries
and
Drivers. I would like to see it divided into sections similar to the way GNOME
Additional Packages is split into three sections.
I would like to organize Chapter 35 into something like the list below.
We might wa
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I would like to propose a change to the organization of Multimedia Libraries
> and
> Drivers. I would like to see it divided into sections similar to the way
> GNOME
> Additional Packages is split into three sections.
I think the proposal is overkill. To me, it would be a
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I suppose my biggest area of concern is how to you
> separate video and audio packages, when many of them do
> both?
It's a good question, but to me video implies audio, so I would divide them in
to video/audio and audio only.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.o
