On 10/25/18 12:53 AM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the following error:
so far I fail to build FF63 too (while 62.0.3 was fine)...
This is with gcc 7.3.0 and the system_graphite2_harfbuzz-1
Hi all
Just tried to build firefox 63.0 and got the folllowing error:
-12:10.16 /lgl-bld/firefox-63.0/js/src/vm/JSContext-inl.h:180:73: error:
no ‘void JSContext::checkImpl_63(int, const Head&, const Tail& ...)’
member function declared in class ‘JSContext’
12:10.16
Just in case anybody wondered: unlike firefox, thunderbird seems to work
fine with icu 63.1, just compiled and tested it.
Bye
Tim
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 11/1/18 7:47 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
I found lxqt-0.13 working very well within LFS-8.3, and
I think team should reconsider its decision about it.
Within a private email exchange with Bruce trying to make the point,
he told me "LXQ dependencies are cumbersome, I
Hi all
I ran into strange problems when updating gvfs to 1.38.1. It turned out
that the problem was that the lib stuff got installed into /usr/lib64
instead of /usr/lib. gfvs was then not working
Now, this might well be the because I'm still on glib 2.58.0, but in
any case, adding
On 1/16/19 6:13 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/16/19 11:09 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I ran into strange problems when updating gvfs to 1.38.1. It turned
out that the problem was that the lib stuff got installed into
/usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib. gfvs
Hi all
Just started to build openldap 2.4.47 and it seems that there are quite
some "interesting" changes:
- There is no slapd in /usr/sbin/ anymore, it is instead in /usr/lib
- All slap.. stuff in /usr/sbin now link to ../lib/slapd
Therefore, the init scriptm which expects /usr/sbin/slapd
Hi all
On 12/20/18 11:54 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Just started to build openldap 2.4.47 and it seems that there are quite
some "interesting" changes:
- There is no slapd in /usr/sbin/ anymore, it is instead in /usr/lib
- All slap.. stuff in /usr/sbin now link
Hi all
Just got the time to do some catch-up and then noticed that ffmpeg
4.0.2 does not compile with fdk-aac 2.0.0.
The problem is described at:
https://github.com/mstorsjo/fdk-aac/issues/93
and ffmpeg git has some patches. I created a patch using the current git
versions of
On 3/21/19 12:19 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi Ken
On 3/21/19 12:36 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:14:50PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 09:37:44PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On that machine, build 3 built
Hi Ken
On 3/21/19 12:36 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:14:50PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 09:37:44PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On that machine, build 3 built ok and generally worked - except that
attempting to
Hi all
On my lan/wlan routers, I currently use a bridge interface br0 for use
of the wlan access point that also includes the physical ethernet
interfaces. This all runs nice and well.
In order to implement an unprivileged guest network, I want to add
another bridge, called br1, to which
On 3/21/19 12:50 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/21/19 12:19 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi Ken
On 3/21/19 12:36 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:14:50PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 09:37:44PM +, Ken Moffat
On 3/21/19 7:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:35:36AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/21/19 6:19 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
I just noticed on my development system, where nothing has been used for
about nine hours, that pulseaudio
On 5/1/19 2:08 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi,
initd-tools is for managing bootscripts in /etc/rc?.d. Shouldn't it be removed
from the systemd book?
Pierre
Yes, I'm quite sure they are not needed there. I couldn't live without
them anymore, but then, I'm not using systemd. For
On 5/1/19 5:41 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 01/05/2019 16:24, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 5/1/19 7:08 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi,
initd-tools is for managing bootscripts in /etc/rc?.d. Shouldn't it be removed
from the systemd book?
Pierre
Hi
On 5/1/19 10:52 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 01/05/2019 20:38, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 5/1/19 5:41 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 01/05/2019 16:24, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 5/1/19 7:08 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi,
initd
On 5/3/19 9:09 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On May 1, 2019 5:30:13 PM CDT, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 5/1/19 10:52 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Well, I didn't know that systemd could use sysv bootscripts... So
my question
is irrelevant. OTOH, this package needs
Hi all
I should sometimes investigate a bit more before wasting other people's
time. pacrunner indeed is built due to libproxy, which I didn't have
before, so all is clear and correct now.
Sorry for the noise
Tim
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
Hi all
I wanted to upgrade glib-networking from 2.56.0 to 2.60.2 and noticed
that, apart from the gio modules, there now is also a binary called
/usr/libexec/glib-pacrunner
along with a
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gtk.GLib.PACRunner.service
Both of these files are not described in blfs
On 7/11/19 6:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Tim, dear Douglas,
On 7/11/19 6:34 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build out of
the box with rustc 1.35.0. I'm currently looking
On 7/11/19 8:02 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:34:48AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev <
blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
Hi all
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird
Hi all
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build out of
the box with rustc 1.35.0. I'm currently looking for solutions/patches,
seems that ubuntu has something. If anybody has seen a patch regarding
"fix-missing-docs-error", I'd welcome any pointers, of course.
The
On 7/11/19 6:53 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/11/19 6:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Tim, dear Douglas,
On 7/11/19 6:34 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build
On 7/11/19 6:38 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Tim, dear Douglas,
On 7/11/19 6:34 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:32 AM Tim Tassonis wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that thunderbird seems not to build out of
the box with rustc 1.35.0. I'm currently looking
Hi all
As you can see in my mail headers, I now managed to compile
thunderbird-60.8.0 with rustc 1.35.0, using the following two sed commands:
sed -i -e '/#!\[deny(missing_docs)\]/d' servo/components/style/lib.rs
sed -i -e 's/#!\[deny(unsafe_code,
missing_docs)\]/#!\[deny(unsafe_code)\]/g'
On 7/12/19 1:08 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/11/19 5:28 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:39:23PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
As you can see in my mail headers, I now managed to compile
thunderbird-60.8.0 with rustc 1.35.0, using
On 6/28/19 7:01 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 6/28/19 11:26 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 05:54:07PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
I have created a patch according to issue #12208 and also added and
commited
it to:
svn+ssh
On 8/13/19 11:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 3:29 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 9:57 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.08.2019, 19:58 +0200 schrieb Tim Tassonis via
blfs-dev:
Hi all
For anybody using xfce4 as their desktop, I wanted to share
Hi again
I've just closed the ticket 12389: xfce 4.14 and I think compiling xfce
4.14 like it is now in the book is correct. However, I might have missed
some new optional dependencies and some that don't exist anymore. What I
did change, apart from just the version bumbs:
- added an
On 8/14/19 12:08 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 4:44 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 11:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 3:29 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/13/19 9:57 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.08.2019, 19:58 +0200
On 7/31/19 10:01 AM, hykwok1--- via blfs-dev wrote:
2. For Gnome, the default font name of "Monospace font" is "Source Code Pro".
(Reference:
https://github.com/GNOME/gsettings-desktop-schemas/blob/master/schemas/org.gnome.desktop.interface.gschema.xml.in)
The font can be downloaded from:
On 8/20/19 3:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/19/19 8:17 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
Good evening folks,
I noticed something in my Google Highlights app on my phone that
looked interesting:
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15816#c8
It referenced a bug in
On 8/14/19 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
For the last couple of days, I've been running xfce and using
xfce-terminal (old 4.12). And a lot of the time, when I try to
paste something I get pop-up warnings:
Warning: Unsafe Paste
Pasting this text to the terminal may be dangerous
On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:08:09AM +0200, gabriele balducci via blfs-dev wrote:
Looking at fedora,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox/tree/master they seem to
On 9/3/19 7:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Looks as if dbus-glib should now be required
On 9/3/19 7:44 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/19 2:43 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Looks as if dbus-glib should now be required
Hi all
Despite the current freeze, I have taken the thunderbird ticket, as I
just can'r wait to get my hands on the new version...
I will of course not update the page until I'm told to, but will try to
build the new version and note the changes needed.
Having started now, I can already
On 8/28/19 4:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/28/19 6:10 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Despite the current freeze, I have taken the thunderbird ticket, as I
just can'r wait to get my hands on the new version...
I will of course not update the page until I'm told
Hi all
I just did a huge audio/video update extravaganza on my system and
realized that alsa-plugins-1.1.9 does not seem to use ffmpeg anymore.
This does not really change any instructions on the book, only that the
optional dependency to ffmpeg should be removed.
If nobody has a
On 10 September 2019 19:51:22 Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 9/10/19 12:36 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that initd-tools is gone from BLFS and seems to have been
replaced by lsb-tools. I also noticed that BLFS bootscripts have been
updated with tons of fixes
On 9/10/19 6:32 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/09/2019 17:49, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
After installing yad, a gtk3 shell-script dialog implementation, I finally
decided to solve my long-standing issue of some applications (evince)
complaining about
GLib-GIO
Hi all
After installing yad, a gtk3 shell-script dialog implementation, I
finally decided to solve my long-standing issue of some applications
(evince) complaining about
GLib-GIO-Message: Using the 'memory' GSettings backend. Your settings
will not be saved or shared with other
Hi all
I noticed that initd-tools is gone from BLFS and seems to have been
replaced by lsb-tools. I also noticed that BLFS bootscripts have been
updated with tons of fixes for dependency information, so thanks for all
the work on that!
However, I noticed that lsb-tools is implemented in
Hi all
When trying to upgrade mupdf to the latest release an checking the
linked libraries, I stumbled across error due to missing
libmupdfthird.so
libmupdfthreads.so
libmupdfpkcs7.so
it turns out that mupdf-1.16.1-shared_libs-1.patch on line 32 to 34
sets the names to:
+THIRD_LIB =
On 9/21/19 12:44 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 12:04:53AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When trying to upgrade mupdf to the latest release an checking the linked
libraries, I stumbled across error due to missing
libmupdfthird.so
On 9/21/19 1:19 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/20/19 5:04 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When trying to upgrade mupdf to the latest release an checking the
linked libraries, I stumbled across error due to missing
libmupdfthird.so
libmupdfthreads.so
libmupdfpkcs7.so
On 30 September 2019 19:23:04 Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all,
so far i have built a nice Xfce system avoiding python2, gtk2 and
rustc at all and Xfce-4.14 builds/runs fine without gtk2. For librsvg
i use the old non-rust version 2.40.20 which still works pretty well -
ok, i
Hi all
I have created a patch according to issue #12208 and also added and
commited it to:
svn+ssh://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/curl/curl-7.65.1-fix-dns-segfaults-1.patch
I'm not quite sure how to proceed now. It is not (yet) at
Hi all
After detecting that evince 3.34.1 does not build with the required
depencies, I digged in a bit more and found out the following:
As both GNONE and gentoo recommed appstream-glib as solution, I found
out that:
/usr/share/gettext/its/appdata.loc
Hi all
I tried to build evince-3.34.1 by the book and get the following error:
GEN evince-pdfdocument.metainfo.xml
/usr/bin/msgfmt: cannot locate ITS rules for
evince-pdfdocument.metainfo.xml.in
make[3]: *** [Makefile:922: evince-pdfdocument.metainfo.xml] Error 1
After digging around,
Hi all
I just built samba 4.11.0 and while the book says to require
Python-2.7.17, the Release Notes say it requires python3.
From the Release Notes
(https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.11.0.html):
Python2 support
---
Samba 4.11 will not have any runtime support
Hi all
Has anybody tried to install latest pycairo with DESTDIR
While
python2 setup.py install --optimize=1 --root=$DESTDIR
works, both
python2 setup.py install_pycairo_header --root=$DESTDIR
python2 setup.py install_pkgconfig --root=$DESTDIR
fail, with
error: option --root not
On 11/12/19 3:40 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 11/11/19 6:20 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
Has anybody tried to install latest pycairo with DESTDIR
While
python2 setup.py install --optimize=1 --root=$DESTDIR
works, both
python2 setup.py install_pycairo_header
On 11/4/19 4:57 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 11/3/19 7:40 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
After detecting that evince 3.34.1 does not build with the required
depencies, I digged in a bit more and found out the following:
As both GNONE and gentoo recommed appstream
Hi all
I just studied the elogind page, where it says that I should modify
/etc/pam.d/system-session, to include the elogind stuff.
I'm a bit reluctant to do so, as I've got several systems running as
servers and routers, with no graphical user interface and no dbus present.
As I
Hi all
Sorry if this is an already answered question, but I found no clear
answer on the list.
I have noticed the inclusion of elogind in BLFS and so far, I did not
care about it, as it seemed a Gnome thing and I'm using Xfce.
But as I'm going to do an all new build of everything soon, I
On 10/22/19 12:09 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just studied the elogind page, where it says that I should modify
/etc/pam.d/system-session, to include the elogind stuff.
I'm a bit reluctant to do so
On 10/22/19 9:21 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 22/10/2019 00:15, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/22/19 12:09 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:31:25PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
I just studied the elogind page, where
Hi all
I just tried to build Talloc-2.3.0, using the mentioned
--extra-python=PYTHON
option. However, this does not seem to be supported anymore:
waf: error: no such option: --extra-python
Or am I missing something?
If nobody objects, I'll create a ticket and remove that option from the
On 10/3/19 10:50 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 03/10/2019 21:45, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 10/3/19 1:56 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I'm going to try to become "upstream" for the standalone localed
daemon. I think I'll take the openrc implementation rather than
On 10/14/19 2:17 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
For a long time, fetchmail has warned about running as root. For
6.4.1 I'm inclined to try running it as user fetchmail and group
nogroup. But that raises the question of which uid to assign.
Looking at /postlfs/users.html (or
On 4/9/20 8:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/9/20 12:46 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/9/20 7:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:23:24PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that I do get quite different build sizes
On 4/9/20 7:07 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:23:24PM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that I do get quite different build sizes for thunderbird than
other maintainers, so I thought I will give a few infos about how I build
thunderbird
Hi all
I noticed that I do get quite different build sizes for thunderbird than
other maintainers, so I thought I will give a few infos about how I
build thunderbird. Maybe this helps to find out what's going on here.
du -hs /lgl-bld/thunderbird-68.7.0/
reports
4.2G
Hi all
As dhcpcd 9.0.0 changed the location of its pidfile(-s), the
/lib/services/dhcpcd bootscript has to be updated.
I did this, but I dont know how then to prepare the needed tar.xz package.
Can anybody tell me how to go about this?
Bye
Tim
--
On 4/4/20 7:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 4/4/20 5:09 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As dhcpcd 9.0.0 changed the location of its pidfile(-s), the
/lib/services/dhcpcd bootscript has to be updated.
I did this, but I dont know how then to prepare the needed tar.xz
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has to be created and that user
needs to have access to /var/lib/dhcpcd
I thought of doing something similar to openssh:
install
On 4/3/20 11:00 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 09:56 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I'm about to give the new dhcpcd 9.0.0 a go, which has quite an
important change: it does privilege separation now.
This means that an unprivileged user has
Hi Ryan
On 3/30/20 8:50 PM, Ryan Marsaw via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello all.
When building v4l-utils per BLFS instructions I get the following at the
configure stage:
[...]
checking for SDL2... no
[...]
The only way I could get v4l-utils to recognize SDL2 was to set
SDL2_LIBS and SDL2_CFLAGS:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe with vlan tagging
for fiber connections, I wondered if vlan tagging could get supported
in the network scripts.
As I found out
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:47 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 12:24 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe
On 9/4/20 2:12 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:44:31AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:47 +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/1/20 7:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs
Hi all
Maybe a bit off-topic, but a while ago, the BLFS book had instructions
on how to build openssl with symbol versioning, so openssl-1.0 and
openssl-1.1 can be mixed. As openssl-1.0 is out now, this seems to have
been removed, but maybe somebody still remembers the instruction. I now
On 9/4/20 5:30 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/20 8:35 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
I assume that ppp gets some kind of revival due to some ISP's
requiring it for fiber connections. Therefore I'd vote for
de-archiving the package. It now even has systemd suppport
On 9/4/20 5:03 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 9:27 AM Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
<mailto:blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org>> wrote:
On 9/4/20 8:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 9/4/20 12:36 AM, Tim Tassonis via bl
On 9/4/20 8:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/20 12:36 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/20 2:12 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:44:31AM +0200, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev
wrote:
On 9/3/20 10:29 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote
Hi all
As one of Switzerland largest ISP's requires pppoe with vlan tagging for
fiber connections, I wondered if vlan tagging could get supported in the
network scripts.
As I found out via https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VLAN, one can
create a tagged VLAN using
ip link add link
Hi all
I'm in the process of building BLFS 10, which is the first time that I
will have to build elogind.
I'm currently a bit lost regarding the circular dependencies in this
case, is this the correct order:
1. build X libraries
2. build dbus, without elogind
3. build elogind
4. build
Hi all
I just noticed that although there was a new release of libnsl, version
1.3.0, released on Jul 6, it is not in the book, nor is there a ticket
for it.
I have downloaded and successfully built it on a fresh lfs 10.0 system,
with minor modifications to the instructions from 1.2.0:
-
On 9/25/20 8:39 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just noticed that although there was a new release of libnsl, version
1.3.0, released on Jul 6, it is not in the book, nor is there a ticket
for it.
I have downloaded and successfully built it on a fresh lfs 10.0 system
Hi all
When building nss 3.57 and waiting ages for the tests to be compiled, I
checked the Makefile and found out that, by adding
NSS_DISABLE_GTESTS=1\
to the make command, the build time can quite drasctically be reduced,
as compiling (not even running) the tests seems to
Hi all
Due to fact that my currently quite outdated gcc toolchain fails to
compile latest firefox, I tried to build firefox with clang10.
In case anyone wants to try this, too, I found out that you can run into
problems with c++ libraries built with clang or gcc, I think the root
problem
Hi all
Since a couple of days, I'm experiencing connect issues to
wiki.linuxfromscratch.org. Is this a known issue, or is the problem on
my side?
Bye
Tim
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Hi all
I just went through building xorg with elogind/dbus support until xinit,
as in the book.
I then still had to
chmod u+s $XORG_PREFIX/libexec/Xorg
in order to get X running. So just to make sure I did not fuck up
anywhere: is this still expected behaviour with elogind?
I assume the
On 12/29/20 4:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/29/20 6:52 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I just went through building xorg with elogind/dbus support until
xinit, as in the book.
I then still had to
chmod u+s $XORG_PREFIX/libexec/Xorg
in order to get X running
On 12/3/20 10:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
In some cases PAM may use Berkeley DB libraries. We should probably
change the bdb build to move the libraries to /lib:
...
../dist/configure --prefix=/usr \
--libdir=/lib \ <-- added
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against bdb,
because I had installed bdb since my last pam build.
As I'm not really fond of including bdb in all installations using pam,
I found out that by specifying
--enable-db=no
at configure time, pam will be build
On 12/1/20 5:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against
bdb, because I had installed bdb since my last pam build.
As I'm not really fond of including bdb in all
On 12/1/20 11:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 3:02 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 5:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/1/20 7:48 AM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
When re-building pam version 1.5.1, I noticed that it links against
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought
I give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly, in the
exact order as already in the book.
Apart from many bug-fixes and enhancements. there are just minor changes
to the build:
On 12/25/20 1:52 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/24/20 4:56 PM, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I
thought I give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly, in the
exact order
On 12/25/20 4:04 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought I
give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly
Hi all
I'm just about to build llvm 11 as in current blfs, and wondered if it
would be better to install it in /opt/llvm11, instead of /usr.
The reason I'm asking is that llvm seems to be updated quite often and
I'm not sure about the compatibility of different versions with mesa,
rustc and
On 12/25/20 4:04 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
As a new release of my favorite DE is out and it's christmas, I thought I
give it a go.
In short: An upgrade from 4.14 as in blfs svn works seamlessly
On 12/30/20 4:06 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 15:29 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I now seen to have everything in place for elogind and rootless X,
however, just calling startx still does not seem to work.
I get the following error on startx
On 12/30/20 4:06 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 15:29 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I now seen to have everything in place for elogind and rootless X,
however, just calling startx still does not seem to work.
I get the following error on startx
Hi all
I now seen to have everything in place for elogind and rootless X,
however, just calling startx still does not seem to work.
I get the following error on startx on the console:
[ 382.428] (EE) parse_vt_settings: Cannot open /dev/tty0 (Permission
denied)
If I just call
X vt7
I
Hi all
I am stuck at building libxslt-1.1.34, getting the following error:
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd
doc/xsltproc.xml:8: warning: failed to load external entity
On 1/5/21 11:34 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 09:58 +0100, Tim Tassonis via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi all
I am stuck at building libxslt-1.1.34, getting the following error:
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
