On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:49:30PM +, Ed Batalha wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given that openssl is now in LFS, shouldn't mutt be built --with-ssl
> by default?
> The command in BLFS still doesn't include this, but the option is
> discussed further down the page.
> In my humble opinion ssl shouldn't be optional, it should be the default.
>
> Regards,
> Eduardo
>
Yeah, seems reasonable - picking up the knock-on effects of moving
packages to LFS always needs many eyes.
ĸen
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
