Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-27 Thread Pierre Labastie

On 27/02/2018 11:42, Pierre Labastie wrote:

Le 26/02/2018 18:58:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :

Pierre Labastie wrote:

juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a 
library

not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867).
Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS.


Can you do the update and tag it please.  I was trying to go too fast 
and was building juffed without lxqt.
Is that needed?  We use LIBRARY_PATH=$LXQT_PREFIX/lib, but do not 
mention lxqt in the dependencies.


Oh yes, I'd seen that, but forgot about it... Of course, that's wrong if 
there is no LXQT_PREFIX. I'll try to build this on another system 
without LXQt.


Actually, qtermwidget is recommended, and qtermwidget needs 
lxqt-build-tools. If lxqt-build-tools is in a prefix other than /usr, I 
think qtermwidget and juffed need to know about it. Now, there could be 
other possibilities like building qtermwidget and juffed in /usr even if 
LXQt is in /opt, but I cannot test this thoroughly before the release, I 
fear. So for now, The instructions need to stay as they are, and 
LXQT_PREFIX should be defined when building lxqt-build-tools; 
qtermwidget and juffed.


Pierre

--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-27 Thread Pierre Labastie

Le 26/02/2018 18:58:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :

Pierre Labastie wrote:

juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a  
library

not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867).
Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS.


Can you do the update and tag it please.  I was trying to go too fast  
and was building juffed without lxqt.
Is that needed?  We use LIBRARY_PATH=$LXQT_PREFIX/lib, but do not  
mention lxqt in the dependencies.


Oh yes, I'd seen that, but forgot about it... Of course, that's wrong  
if there is no LXQT_PREFIX. I'll try to build this on another system  
without LXQt.



There is a ticket for alpine already (#10188).


That is for a slightly different issue.  I have the current tarball  
and will copy to anduin and update alpine.



For abiword, I'll try the patch, and let you know.


Please let us know.



That's a complicated issue. I see flickering in KDE and LXQt, but not  
in Xfce... But in Xfce, the cursor is invisible... Not tried the patch  
yet.




Not tested balsa (yet).




I'm writing this mail using balsa...

Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:

lfs81 tags remaining: 518
lfs82 tags  : 274

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34


===

As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 457
lfs82 tags  : 335

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20

I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not 
tonight.


===

As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 272
lfs82 tags  : 521

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16

I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still 
trying to straighten out some issues.  Some of these packages require a 
LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if 
trying to build all the optional deps.


Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 199
lfs82 tags  : 594

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13

I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow.
I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages.

A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome.

DJ and I ran into some problems with java.  We can't build junit or 
freetts.  We probably need to update juint to version 4.12.  Not sure 
about freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web.


Sun Feb 25 20:06:54 CST 2018
 
lfs81 tags remaining:  99

lfs82 tags  : 693

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 11

The junit problem has been solved.  We decided to archive freetts until 
next cycle and possibly look for another text-to-speech app.


New problem apps: juffed, abiword, balsa, alpine (url needs update but we 
have the tarball).


lfs81 tags remaining:  46
lfs82 tags  : 746

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 5

The balsa and alpine problems are solved.  I think Pierre is working 
juffed and abiword.


DJ is working chromium and samba.

I'm like to get someone to tag exim, dovecot, wicd, ntfs-3g, and  cifsutils.

Hoping to get everything done for release by Wednesday.  We'll give things 
a chance to settle for a day or two and plan on releasing Friday or Saturday.


  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Pierre Labastie wrote:


juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library
not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867).
Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS.


Can you do the update and tag it please.  I was trying to go too fast and 
was building juffed without lxqt.  Is that needed?  We use 
LIBRARY_PATH=$LXQT_PREFIX/lib, but do not mention lxqt in the dependencies.

There is a ticket for alpine already (#10188).


That is for a slightly different issue.  I have the current tarball and 
will copy to anduin and update alpine.



For abiword, I'll try the patch, and let you know.


Please let us know.


Not tested balsa (yet).


OK.  I can do it if you don't have time.

  -- Bruce

--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 26/02/2018 03:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:
>
> lfs81 tags remaining: 518
> lfs82 tags  : 274
>
> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34

 ===

 As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018

 lfs81 tags remaining: 457
 lfs82 tags  : 335

 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20

 I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight.
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018
>>>
>>> lfs81 tags remaining: 272
>>> lfs82 tags  : 521
>>>
>>> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16
>>>
>>> I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying
>>> to straighten out some issues.  Some of these packages require a LOT of
>>> dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build
>>> all the optional deps.
>>
>> Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018
>>
>> lfs81 tags remaining: 199
>> lfs82 tags  : 594
>>
>> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13
>>
>> I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow.
>> I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages.
>>
>> A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome.
>>
>> DJ and I ran into some problems with java.  We can't build junit or
>> freetts.  We probably need to update juint to version 4.12.  Not sure about
>> freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web.
> 
> Sun Feb 25 20:06:54 CST 2018
> 
> lfs81 tags remaining: 99
> lfs82 tags  : 693
> 
> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 11
> 
> The junit problem has been solved.  We decided to archive freetts until next
> cycle and possibly look for another text-to-speech app.
> 
> New problem apps: juffed, abiword, balsa, alpine (url needs update but we have
> the tarball).

juffed works for me. What is the problem? If it is a problem with a library
not found, I've fixed it (bad link in qscintilla) (r19867).
Actually the right fix should be to use "readlink", as we do in LFS.

There is a ticket for alpine already (#10188).

For abiword, I'll try the patch, and let you know.

Not tested balsa (yet).

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Ken Moffat wrote:

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:


Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt
will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to
update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present.
That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and
then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out?


I _thought_ I had noticed the omission of the copy when I updated to
1.9.3, and decided it was valid, but I've just now rebuilt and got
an empty text manual.  My memory says that I noticed it at a late
stage, and never got around to updating my own script.

Trying to identify in which commit something disappeared is not
easy, still looking - but it ought to be reinstated.

Hmm, based on a suggestion at stackoverflow, of the form
svn log --diff src/fozbo.cpp -r:HEAD

suggests _I_ took it out in r19714, but trac doesn't show that:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset/19714


Looks like it was r19623.  You missed it by 1 commit.

http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset?reponame==19623%40trunk%2FBOOK%2Fnetworking%2Fmailnews%2Fmutt.xml=19291%40trunk%2FBOOK%2Fnetworking%2Fmailnews%2Fmutt.xml

  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> 
> Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt
> will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to
> update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present.
> That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and
> then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out?
> 
I _thought_ I had noticed the omission of the copy when I updated to
1.9.3, and decided it was valid, but I've just now rebuilt and got
an empty text manual.  My memory says that I noticed it at a late
stage, and never got around to updating my own script.

Trying to identify in which commit something disappeared is not
easy, still looking - but it ought to be reinstated.

Hmm, based on a suggestion at stackoverflow, of the form
svn log --diff src/fozbo.cpp -r:HEAD

suggests _I_ took it out in r19714, but trac doesn't show that:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset/19714

Anyway, I'll reinstate it.

ĸen
-- 
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
 - Unseen Academicals
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:

lfs81 tags remaining: 518
lfs82 tags  : 274

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34


===

As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 457
lfs82 tags  : 335

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20

I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight.


===

As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 272
lfs82 tags  : 521

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16

I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still 
trying to straighten out some issues.  Some of these packages require a 
LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying 
to build all the optional deps.


Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 199
lfs82 tags  : 594

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13

I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow.
I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages.

A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome.

DJ and I ran into some problems with java.  We can't build junit or 
freetts.  We probably need to update juint to version 4.12.  Not sure 
about freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web.


Sun Feb 25 20:06:54 CST 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 99
lfs82 tags  : 693

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 11

The junit problem has been solved.  We decided to archive freetts until 
next cycle and possibly look for another text-to-speech app.


New problem apps: juffed, abiword, balsa, alpine (url needs update but we 
have the tarball).


  -- Bruce


--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Pierre Labastie wrote:


Been there too. For junit, I have added a sed to the book, which allows to
build junit-4.11. For junit-4.12, or junit-5.0.x, the build system is maven,
so it is a big change, and not suitable for 8.2. Note that we should move to
maven for 8.3, since fop can be built with maven too (and is deprecating ant
builds).


I agree with that approach.  I tagged junit-4.11 earlier today.


For freetts, the same trick as for junit allows to compile, but then the
excutable fails with an exception about type casting. I'd suggest archiving
freetts now, and moving to flite after 8.2.


We can do that.  Please open a ticket for 8.3 though.  I'll archive freetts.


other issues:
I am also seeing the flickering in abiword, as reported in
https://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13791. Looks like the bug is
not fixed upstream. Do not know exactly what to do. The proposed patch is big,
and does not apply cleanly to recent versions of abiword.


I read through the bug.  Last entry was September.  Did you try changing 
themes?  abiword builds and runs for me.  I don't see any flickering, but 
I am running over ssh.  The cursor does seem to be a bit erratic as the 
blink rate varies and sometimes disappears completely for several seconds.


The only options I can see are to include a big warning or to just archive it.


Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt
will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to
update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present.
That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and
then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out?


I haven't got to mutt yet, but I'd like to get Ken's opinion.


I do not like the sed in ptlib, I'd rather use --disable-odbc (nothing uses
ptlib with odbc anyway). See my preceding message about ptlib.


See my reply in the other thread.


And last, all the test in perl File::BaseDir in the userdirs.t part have
failed for me. I guess there is a conflict with xdg-user-dirs, which I am
using for LXQt. Should this be mentioned?


What does cpan -i File::BaseDir do?

  -- Bruce


--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 25/02/2018 05:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:

 lfs81 tags remaining: 518
 lfs82 tags  : 274

 Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018
>>>
>>> lfs81 tags remaining: 457
>>> lfs82 tags  : 335
>>>
>>> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20
>>>
>>> I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018
>>
>> lfs81 tags remaining: 272
>> lfs82 tags  : 521
>>
>> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16
>>
>> I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still trying
>> to straighten out some issues.  Some of these packages require a LOT of
>> dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying to build
>> all the optional deps.
> 
> Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018
> 
> lfs81 tags remaining: 199
> lfs82 tags  : 594
> 
> Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13
> 
> I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow.
> I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages.
> 
> A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome.
> 
> DJ and I ran into some problems with java.  We can't build junit or freetts. 
> We probably need to update juint to version 4.12.  Not sure about freetts and
> I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web.
> 

Been there too. For junit, I have added a sed to the book, which allows to
build junit-4.11. For junit-4.12, or junit-5.0.x, the build system is maven,
so it is a big change, and not suitable for 8.2. Note that we should move to
maven for 8.3, since fop can be built with maven too (and is deprecating ant
builds).

For freetts, the same trick as for junit allows to compile, but then the
excutable fails with an exception about type casting. I'd suggest archiving
freetts now, and moving to flite after 8.2.

other issues:
I am also seeing the flickering in abiword, as reported in
https://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13791. Looks like the bug is
not fixed upstream. Do not know exactly what to do. The proposed patch is big,
and does not apply cleanly to recent versions of abiword.

Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt
will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to
update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present.
That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and
then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out?

I do not like the sed in ptlib, I'd rather use --disable-odbc (nothing uses
ptlib with odbc anyway). See my preceding message about ptlib.

And last, all the test in perl File::BaseDir in the userdirs.t part have
failed for me. I guess there is a conflict with xdg-user-dirs, which I am
using for LXQt. Should this be mentioned?

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:

lfs81 tags remaining: 518
lfs82 tags  : 274

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34


===

As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 457
lfs82 tags  : 335

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20

I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight.


===

As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 272
lfs82 tags  : 521

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16

I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still 
trying to straighten out some issues.  Some of these packages require a 
LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying 
to build all the optional deps.


Sat Feb 24 22:42:59 CST 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 199
lfs82 tags  : 594

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 13

I finished up kf5 today and will get the kf5-apps and plasma tomorrow.
I also plan to do lxde and some other misc packages.

A lot of the outstanding packages are systemd related, mostly gnome.

DJ and I ran into some problems with java.  We can't build junit or 
freetts.  We probably need to update juint to version 4.12.  Not sure 
about freetts and I haven't checked fop or IcedTea-Web.


  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:

lfs81 tags remaining: 518
lfs82 tags  : 274

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34


===

As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 457
lfs82 tags  : 335

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20

I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight.


===

As of Thu Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 272
lfs82 tags  : 521

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 16

I tried to get the feh and mercurial tickets done today but am still 
trying to straighten out some issues.  Some of these packages require a 
LOT of dependencies and have substantial circular dependencies if trying 
to build all the optional deps.


  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [blfs-dev] Tagging status

2018-02-19 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

We are doing very well for the first weekend after package freeze:

lfs81 tags remaining: 518
lfs82 tags  : 274

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 34


===

As of Tue Feb 20 05:46:29 UTC 2018

lfs81 tags remaining: 457
lfs82 tags  : 335

Tickets targeted for 8.2: 20

I have a bunch of multimedia packages ready (~45) to tag, but not tonight.

  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page