On 12/01/2016 01:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If we are looking for /pthread_stubs_possible=/ that will not match.
Holy cow! I'm sorry. This entire thread was a waste of time due to a
broken local copy of the book. Apparently I chose mc instead of tc at
some point when merging a
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 12/01/2016 01:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If we are looking for /pthread_stubs_possible=/ that will not match.
I guess I don't understand what you are saying, or I'm confused as to
which sed you are referring to, but if I'm reading above correctly,
On 12/01/2016 01:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If we are looking for /pthread_stubs_possible=/ that will not match.
I guess I don't understand what you are saying, or I'm confused as to
which sed you are referring to, but if I'm reading above correctly,
/pthread_stubs_possible/ does match
DJ Lucas wrote:
On December 1, 2016 10:47:40 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas
wrote:
Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure
to be
generated with
On December 1, 2016 10:47:40 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas
>wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure
>to be
>>> generated with
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure to be
generated with "then\n\nfi" (a syntax error) on my system.
IIUC, we want to make the check not required. I believe
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure to be
> generated with "then\n\nfi" (a syntax error) on my system.
>
> IIUC, we want to make the check not required. I believe this is a more
>