[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux genius 2.4.22 #1 Fri Apr 15 15:29:56 IST 2005 i686 AuthenticAMD
unknown GNU/Linux
How come uname doesn't know this is an LFS box? Even if LFS hasn't
arrived in the notions of uname maintainers, isn't there some smart-alec
sed hierioglyphics, squiggles
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 12:19 +0200, Uli Fahrenberg wrote:
6.15.1. Installation of Coreutils
A known issue with the uname program from this package is that the -p
switch always returns unknown. The following patch fixes this behavior for
Intel architectures:
patch -Np1 -i
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Declan Moriarty, Jun 21, 11:28 +0100:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux genius 2.4.22 #1 Fri Apr 15
15:29:56 IST 2005 i686 AuthenticAMD unknown GNU/Linux
How come uname doesn't know this is an LFS box?
\quote
6.15.1. Installation of
So much for the post mortem. Is coreutils system critical or can I
update it without freaking things?
Shouldn't have any problems updating it, but this is hardly a critical problem.
the coreutils program does overwrite a few binaries installed by later
packages though, so you will have to
