Re: GnuTLS-2xx

2007-09-28 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 9/28/07, Richard Melville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've a general query. Is there any reason why GnuTLS-2xx isn't being used in the BLFS unstable book? I ask this mainly because, for some reason, I had a problem compiling 1.6.3. The problem seemed to be related to GnuPG (working fine)

GnuTLS-2xx

2007-09-28 Thread Richard Melville
Hi I've a general query. Is there any reason why GnuTLS-2xx isn't being used in the BLFS unstable book? I ask this mainly because, for some reason, I had a problem compiling 1.6.3. The problem seemed to be related to GnuPG (working fine) and OpenCDK (also apparently OK). When I tried

Again I need to send to all of you which are making this distribution so clean my best regards

2007-09-28 Thread Thierry Nuttens
As a collaboration to all yours efforts. I have on my home page an original distribution. - The packages are compiled as in the books. - I had to choose a package management system, I did use user package management (one user one package), until I discover CRUX. First I though it was based on

directfb

2007-09-28 Thread Barry Loo
After doing some research, it seems like directfb would be the easiest way to put gimp on on an lfs machine. It also seems that installing it isn't easy enough for _me_. Is there any interest among the blfs developers to write/update the directfb build instructions? Directfb will be very