Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread lux-integ
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 03:54:51 am Mike McCarty wrote: OHCI -- UHCI Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? Is it possible that one would need both, with some hardware setups? I normally have the more popular UHCIi in kernel and OHCI as a kernel module --

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Andrew Benton
On 16/03/10 03:54, Mike McCarty wrote: OHCI -- UHCI Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? lspci from pci-utils http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/pciutils.html Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ:

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Andrew Benton wrote: On 16/03/10 03:54, Mike McCarty wrote: OHCI -- UHCI Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? lspci from pci-utils http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/pciutils.html I'm aware of lspci; however, it does not provide all the information

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:02:56 -0600, Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Is one just to know by some means that all USB 2.0 conform to one or the other of UHCI or OHCI? The kernel's menuconfig help text for EHCI says: If you configure EHCI, you should probably configure the OHCI

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Trent Shea
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:02:56 Mike McCarty wrote: Obviously, UHCI is necessary. However, what about the devices simply listed as USB 2.0 (rev xx) where xx is either 65 or 82? They are seemingly not the same devices as the UHCI USB 1.1, as the USB level shows. However, the required protocol

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Matthew Burgess wrote: The kernel's menuconfig help text for EHCI says: [...] For OHCI it states: On most non-x86 systems, and on x86 hardware that's not using a USB controller from Intel or VIA, this is probably appropriate. It even suggests that 'lspci -v' will provide the interface

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:02:56 -0600 Mike McCarty mike.mcca...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Andrew Benton wrote: On 16/03/10 03:54, Mike McCarty wrote: OHCI -- UHCI Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? lspci from pci-utils

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Trent Shea wrote: [some good stuff] If you can run lspci -v from a running known 'good' configuration you should get some usefule info, too. Thanks! Mike -- p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: AFAIK, what is knows as USB 2.0 is called EHCI in kernelworld. Judging [...] As you have a VIA based motherboard, you should enable UHCI and EHCI to get basic USB functionality and then maybe enable aditional kernel options (mouse? keyboard? printer?). External