> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 00:49 +0800, ?? wrote: >> Excuse me. I am trying to build Gnome 3 in /opt/gnome. I've added >> /opt/gnome/usr/lib/pkgconfig to PKG_CONFIG_PATH and /opt/gnome/usr/lib >> to "ld.so.conf". > why it is /opt/gnome/usr/lib ? Shouldn't it be /opt/gnome/lib instead ? > What arguments are you passing to configure script ?
./configure --prefix=/opt/gnome/usr --sysconfdir=/opt/gnome/etc > >From my personal experience, you are better off using conventional paths > i.e "./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc".I have build > gnome-2.30 two or three times and have found when using anything other > than /usr, you are sure to run into trouble. > >> /bin/grep: /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la: No such file or directory >> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la: No such file or directory >> libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool archive >> > > Does making a symbolic link in /usr/lib solves this ? > To some extends it does, except some warning messages "xxx.la seems to be move". I am afraid of that creating symbolic link will cause some potential problem in the future. Thanks for your help. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
