On Fri, 04 May 2012 10:27:52 +0100
"Armin K." wrote:
> --enable-gtk2-dependency removes that conflict.
That's interesting. Is that for Gtk 3? We don't want to make Gtk 2 a
required dep of Gtk 3 so we couldn't make that option the default. We
could put a switch on the configure line that tests if
On 05/04/2012 10:56 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 04 May 2012 06:38:45 +0100
> Thanos Baloukas wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> Could someone please answer to the question if there are conflicts between
>> Gtk+-2.24.10 and Gtk+-3.4.1? Can they both be installed in /usr?
>> Thanks
>
> There is a slight
On 05/04/2012 07:37 AM, Thanos Baloukas wrote:
> Hello
>
> Could someone please answer to the question if there are conflicts between
> Gtk+-2.24.10 and Gtk+-3.4.1? Can they both be installed in /usr?
> Thanks
>
> Thanos
Well if you look close at the instructions you would notice they are
both me
On Fri, 04 May 2012 06:38:45 +0100
Thanos Baloukas wrote:
> Hello
>
> Could someone please answer to the question if there are conflicts between
> Gtk+-2.24.10 and Gtk+-3.4.1? Can they both be installed in /usr?
> Thanks
There is a slight conflict as they both
install /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-c
Hello
Could someone please answer to the question if there are conflicts between
Gtk+-2.24.10 and Gtk+-3.4.1? Can they both be installed in /usr?
Thanks
Thanos
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the abo
