Hi,
Simon Geard wrote on: Mon, 12 Sep 2005:
As far as getting MonoDevelop working though, 0.5.1 doesn't seem to be
the current version though - go-mono.org lists 0.7 as current - so you
could try that.
As I said in my last post, I have now gone beyond that. I have used mono-1.0
earlier on
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 02:11 +, randhir phagura wrote:
././FileBrowser/FileBrowser.cs(24,15): error CS1527: Namespace elements
cannot be explicitly declared as private, protected or protected internal
Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings
make[3]: *** [MonoDevelop.Gui.Widgets.dll]
Hi Simon,
I tried mono install anew. The results of my research so far are that there
are severe version mismatches. I have reached till the end of the install
i.e. upto installing the final package 'monodevelop-0.5.1' which actually
provides the IDE.
It did not complain upto the 'configure'
Hi,
Simon Geard wrote on Tue, 06 Sep 2005:
All the packages mentioned by you are already in the system. Having seen
various threads on Mono List, it seems there is a problem with some
packages at that end.
Are the relevant .pc files present in /usr/lib/pkgconfig (or the
equivalent for
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 06:44 +, randhir phagura wrote:
Also the '2.0' sharps in 'mono' seem to be created by 'gtk-sharp-2.x'
and the plain sharps are by 'gtk-sharp-1.x'.
Yes, that's correct. Although I'm not sure if very much software
requires 2.x yet, probably since all the 2.x versions are
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 05:31 +, randhir phagura wrote:
Hi,
Simon Geard wrote on Sat, 03 Sep 2005:
Of the optional packages, the last three are the ones it considers to be
part of gnome. I'd suggest though, that you need all of them to get
useful functionality.
All the packages
Hi,
Simon Geard wrote on Sat, 03 Sep 2005:
Of the optional packages, the last three are the ones it considers to be
part of gnome. I'd suggest though, that you need all of them to get
useful functionality.
All the packages mentioned by you are already in the system. Having seen
various
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 00:14 +, randhir phagura wrote:
Hi,
Simon Geard wrote on: Thu, 01 Sep 2005
That said, I'd be surprised if you could do anything useful
with purely the GTK part - most programs targetted at Mono
(e.g Tomboy, Blam, Beagle) will require the Gnome libraries
as well.
Hi,
Simon Geard wrote on: Thu, 01 Sep 2005
That said, I'd be surprised if you could do anything useful
with purely the GTK part - most programs targetted at Mono
(e.g Tomboy, Blam, Beagle) will require the Gnome libraries
as well.
Yeah ! But what constitutes 'Gnome libraries' in this
Randhir Phagura wrote:
An abstract from 'gtk-sharp configure script'is given
below: There is one dependency shown as 'GNOME_CFLAGS
GNOME_LIBS' (marked with * *). Then again further down
'ENABLE_GNOME_TRUE ENABLE_GNOME_FALSE'. What do you make
of that?
Ok, my earlier reply was somewhat
Hi,
Thanks for your response Simon; You have given me an accurate method to
check dependencies. Please see below:
Simon Geard wrote on Tue, 30 Aug 2005:
Yes, it's a reference to Gnome in general, not to specific libraries.
Looking at the configure script for gtk-sharp, you'll want at least
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:54 +, randhir phagura wrote:
Now is this 'GNOME-2.0 libraries' a generalised term for GNOME or does it
refer to specific packages? Which packages should be included to satisfy the
requirement?
Yes, it's a reference to Gnome in general, not to specific libraries.
Hi,
I am trying to install 'mono' on BLFS. 'Mono' is a .NET program for linux.
For installing 'monodevelop' IDE there is a requirement of GNOME-2.0
libraries.
An abstract from the relevent 'gtk-sharp' FAQ states:
If you have additional GNOME-2.0 libraries installed, the configure
script
13 matches
Mail list logo
