Hi,
David Ciecierski wrote on Thu, 25 Aug 2005
But now... compilation does not produce the Xorg executable. I have no idea
why. Below is my host.def - can you please have a look and suggest what
could have gone wrong? Thanks in advance!
It is best to follow the host.def given in the Book. Yo
Just for everyone's information (if you care), it would probably make
a difference if you check out the CVS because the *nix builds are
moving to a default of using cairo. But this isn't implemented in the
1.0.x line. Based on Randy's info, it sounds like gtk-2.8.x works
with firefox and thunderb
frank wrote these words on 08/26/05 15:27 CDT:
> ok, looks like gtk is not the reason. i'll try harder with firefox
> compilation. maybe i'll also try the 'mozilla way' (if i ever find out
> what it is).
I wish I could help. I just finished updating the book with updates
to both Firefox and Thund
Andrew Benton wrote:
I get the gdk warnings but they're not critical. Firefox runs fine
here with gtk-2.8.2. I don't build Firefox the BLFS way, I build it
the mozilla way from current cvs
ok, looks like gtk is not the reason. i'll try harder with firefox
compilation. maybe i'll also try
Guido Schimmels wrote:
This is a bug in gtk-2.8.0. gtk-2.8.0 is a lemon, gtk-2.8.1 is worse. Upgrade
to gtk-2.8.2.
I don't promise it solves all the firefox issues (I can't know). But you want
to do that anyway.
gtk-2.8.0 and gtk-2.8.1 are really, really buggy.
just for info: i did the upg
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:55:36 +0200
frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in addition there are lots of gdk warnings (also repeated):
>
> (firefox-bin:2021): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_drawable_get_colormap:
> assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed
>
> (firefox-bin:2021): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_wind
frank wrote these words on 08/26/05 11:52 CDT:
> i assume you have firefox running properly on a gtk+-2.8.0 build.
Yes, I do. Thunderbird as well.
> just
> for information, do you also get these gdk warnings?
Yes. Tons of warnings.
--
Randy
rmlinux: [bogomips 3923.96] [GNU ld version 2.16.1
frank wrote:
i assume you have firefox running properly on a gtk+-2.8.0 build. just
for information, do you also get these gdk warnings? as 2.8.x is not yet
in blfs i may have done some mistakes.
I get the gdk warnings but they're not critical. Firefox runs fine here with gtk-2.8.2. I don't
Hi,
thanks to all for your help. I am sorry that I started a new thread within
an old one, I didn't know that
this happens when I reply with another subject. But now the good message I
could solve my passwd
problem. The failure was that I mistyped while preparing the configure file
of pam. Somethi
Randy McMurchy wrote:
According the Moz FAQ, this is caused if you installed firefox
and then didn't run it one time as root. This is required, as the
nsExtensionManager creates some files (and a dir) in the
/usr/lib/firefox-1.0.6 directory.
yes, i am aware of that. this happens running firef
frank wrote these words on 08/26/05 09:55 CDT:
> i dont get firefox-1.0.6 starting up. i have gtk+2.8.0/2 which needs
> cairo and pango with cairo support installed.
>
> it starts (which is known and ok according to former posts):
> *** nsExtensionManager::_disableObsoleteExtensions - failure, ca
Declan Moriarty schrieb:
> You might need gcc-2.95 to make gcc-2.95 :-/.
Very nice circular dependency. :-(
> If you just want libstdc++.so.5, do you want it attached to an email?
No thanks, I got it from gcc 3.3.6 already.
> Have you installed Openoffice? You may have libstdc++.so.5 in the
>
Hi
> > Everything seemed to work good and I am quite sure
> that I did
> > everything like it was described. The only little
> problem I noticed
> > was that the pam.d directory was not created by
> the install of pam,
I also ran into the same situation before, or even
worse, on reinstalli
Further to that, xfig is seriously awol, or mebbe the Widgets
The widgets compiled from the xc/lib/Xaw3d/README.XAW3D without
incident.
I don't think I have latex, and it seems to be wedded into this also.
Some functions just plain don't work. the File/open only lets me choose
figs. I can't impo
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> Hi,
>
> I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system
> (6.0-testing-20040901). Unfortunately this gcc version was removed
> from the blfs book so I tried the instructions from blfs 5.0. I added
> another patch for the trap posix incompatibility
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> Hello all,
>
> i am very new to the blfs mailinglist and I am doing my first try to
> build up an own system from scratch. My BLFS shall become a nice
> little Samba DC in future. So I looked up the samba dependencies in
> the book and decided to
hi!
i dont get firefox-1.0.6 starting up. i have gtk+2.8.0/2 which needs
cairo and pango with cairo support installed.
it starts (which is known and ok according to former posts):
*** nsExtensionManager::_disableObsoleteExtensions - failure, catching
exception so finalize window can close
i
Hello all,
i am very new to the blfs mailinglist and I am doing my first try to build
up an own system from scratch. My BLFS shall become a nice little Samba DC
in future. So I looked up the samba dependencies in the book and decided to
install Linux-PAM-0.80 with cracklib-2.8.3.
Everything see
Dan Osterrath wrote:
Hi,
I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system
Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
But then anoher question: Why does /usr/include/bits/stdio-lock.h from
glibc-2.3.4-20040701 include lowlevellock.h, which does not exist on my
system? Did it exists in the kernel headers which were deleted after
successfully compiling glibc?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Dan Osterrath wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system
>
>
> Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3?
Yes, gcc-3.3.6 in the BLFS svn.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/bl
Andrew Benton schrieb:
> Dan Osterrath wrote:
>> I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system
> Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3?
Indeed, this is built by gcc 3.2 and 3.3.
Thanx for the tip.
/me asks himself how could his mind got to 2.95.x...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Hi,
I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system
(6.0-testing-20040901). Unfortunately this gcc version was removed from
the blfs book so I tried the instructions from blfs 5.0. I added another
patch for the trap posix incompatibility but when compiling it stops
with the following error:
---
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> Declan Moriarty wrote these words on 08/25/05 13:00 CST:
>
> > Thanks Randy - that patch rocks. No complaints, no bellyaching from
> > patch, no errors.
>
> Glad I could help.
Ahem! Transfig is there and loaded, but
/blushing.
I was actually _w
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> >I will in just a few minutes and update the topic, thanks for the tip!
>
> Nope, still no success... I will try commenting out other things. If
> only it didn't take so long to rebuild the thing!
>
I'd diff it with the original. Even if you have
25 matches
Mail list logo
