Julien Demoor wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install Expect 5.43. Several errors happen during
compilation, the log is attached to this message. I have tcl/tk 8.4.11.
How can I fix this ?
Thanks.
Julien Demoor
gcc
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Greetings,
I am attempting to compile samba3.0.20 on an LFS-based installation
and compilation fails everytinme (regardless of the configure
options).I get the folowing message:
compiling dynoconfig.c gcc dynoconfig.c no such file or
On my system, tclInt.h is in /usr/include/tcl8.4/unix/tclInt.h
I don't know how it went to the wrong place. It's fixed now. Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi again,
I'm building XMMS on an amd64.
I have ALSA, aRts and EsounD installed, and am running KDE, where all the
system sounds are working just fine.
I've (apparently) successfully compiled XMMS, but I cannot play any files
in it. When I go to the preferences, the input plugins listed are:
When I create a new user
# useradd -m username
the user's home directory is created with a bad set of permissions.
(drwxr-xr-x) Where do I set the default permissions for home
directories? I'd prefer 700 (wrx--) for the home directories.
- Joe
--
Brandin Creech wrote these words on 09/20/05 14:33 CST:
So, here's what I suggest:
umask 0077
mkdir /home/username
useradd -m username
I don't have time to research it, but couldn't a rule be set in
/etc/default/useradd?
BTW - The instructions above could be made simpler by this:
install
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Michael Kipper wrote:
Hi again,
I'm building XMMS on an amd64.
I have ALSA, aRts and EsounD installed, and am running KDE, where all the
system sounds are working just fine.
I've (apparently) successfully compiled XMMS, but I cannot play any files
in it. When I go to the
Randy McMurchy schrieb:
umask 0077
mkdir /home/username
useradd -m username
install -m700 -d /home/username
useradd -m username
chown username/usergroup /home/username (this was added)
Then I suggest
install -m700 -ousername -gusergroup /home/username
useradd -m username
signature.asc
Dan Osterrath wrote these words on 09/20/05 15:31 CST:
Then I suggest
install -m700 -ousername -gusergroup /home/username
useradd -m username
Of course. Dumb me. (you did leave off the -d switch, though) :-)
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:31:01PM +0200, Dan Osterrath wrote:
Then I suggest
install -m700 -ousername -gusergroup /home/username
Won't that give an unknown user/group error? Afterall, the user doesn't
exist before useradd.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your
2. Do NOT change the extensions you compile in. The list of extensions
in the configure script is absolutely non-negotiable. Just take what
BLFS and the FF mozconfig file suggest (which should be the same).
D'oh! That effectively was the problem. Well, that'll teach me
to think to know
On 9/20/05, jlh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I once thought that setting --enable-extensions=all is a good
thing. I later then set it to --enable-extensions=default,
default is for the mozilla suite (basically). If you want to be sure
about the extensions for firefox, look at the file
I have compiled Xorg on a fresh LFS system, using the package user
hint, and have two major problems - the first (which I also had on
Gentoo many months ago, and never could fix there - it *didn't* happen
on my previous LFS) is that once X starts, killing it or trying to
switch back to a TTY
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:07 am, Brandin Creech wrote:
This is a general question about the move/re-size behaviour of every window
manager I've seen under Linux. Most of them support opaque move/re-size
in which the contents of the window is updated continuously during a move
or re-size
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 12:33 -0700, Brandin Creech wrote:
umask 0077
mkdir /home/username
useradd -m username
Every time you add a user? That would get old real fast if you expect
to add more than 3 users.
This is why we have shell scripts. :)
--
Lennon Victor
Brandin Creech wrote these words on 09/20/05 20:23 CST:
That assumes the last argument given to useradd is the username. I think this
is the only correct way to specify it to useradd, anyway.
I mentioned this earlier, but this thread won't die so I'll mention
it again. Can't one simply set up
But my question is about the non-opaque (transparent) mode, in which
only
an outline is shown. The problem I have is that in every WM I've seen
with
this mode, the WM seems to freeze all other applications during the move
or
re-size operation. When I let go of the mouse, the
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 08:26:05PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
I mentioned this earlier, but this thread won't die so I'll mention
it again. Can't one simply set up a rule in /etc/default/useradd?
Not having looked at the code, but relying on what is in
/etc/default/useradd, useradd -D, and
Archaic wrote these words on 09/20/05 21:11 CST:
Perhaps there is a public_html dir. 0700 on
/home/username would kill it.
Yup. But the OP requested a method to set 0700 on his home dirs.
This is what I thought the thread was about. Not debating the need
for 0700.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:17:16PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Yup. But the OP requested a method to set 0700 on his home dirs.
This is what I thought the thread was about. Not debating the need
for 0700.
True enough, but just throwing it out there for completeness sake,
especially since
writability is needed. Perhaps there is a public_html dir. 0700 on
/home/username would kill it.
Since we're already off topic...
No, it won't kill the public_html dir. I happen to have an account on a
system in which the home directory has 0700 permissions, but so long as
the public_html
Doug Reich wrote these words on 09/20/05 21:34 CST:
No, it won't kill the public_html dir. I happen to have an account on a
system in which the home directory has 0700 permissions, but so long as
the public_html directory has 755 permissions, everything will work
fine. The 0700 on the home
Archaic wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:34:48PM -0400, Doug Reich wrote:
Since we're already off topic...
No, it won't kill the public_html dir. I happen to have an account on a
system in which the home directory has 0700 permissions, but so long as
the public_html directory has 755
23 matches
Mail list logo
