Re: GNOME 2.12 Status

2005-10-11 Thread Simon Geard
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 00:54 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: Incidentally, if you build gnome-menus against Gamin and then uninstall it and use FAM, you'll need to reinstall gnome-menus as it breaks the gnome panel. Gnome-menus sets a compile time flag, FAMNoExists, according to whether you're

Re: GNOME 2.12 Status

2005-10-11 Thread Simon Geard
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:03 +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote: /Makes a mental note not to even open a gnome archive until someone says it's easy. Oh, installing it is easy enough - it's just a lengthy process due to the number of packages involved (60+). The problem is for those like Randy who are

Control-center-2.12.1

2005-10-11 Thread Dan Nicholson
Hey Randy, Control-center --enable-aboutme bombed looking for libebook/e-book.h. I think this is in evolution, which I didn't install. Here's the error: gnome-about-me.c:32:29: libebook/e-book.h: No such file or directory Seems configure didn't really figure out whether I had evolution or

Re: GNOME 2.12 Status

2005-10-11 Thread Randy McMurchy
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 23:34 +1300, Simon Geard wrote: Haven't investigated thoroughly yet, but reading the HAL mailing lists suggests the problem is probably related to changes in recent udev versions. At minimum, hotplug is partly broken, since it's no longer auto-loading usb-storage.

Re: Control-center-2.12.1

2005-10-11 Thread Randy McMurchy
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 07:46 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: Control-center --enable-aboutme bombed looking for libebook/e-book.h. Thanks for the update, Dan. I will remove the --enable-aboutme parameter. It's really a worthless tool anyway, I should never have added this switch in the first place.

Re: gcc 2.3.5

2005-10-11 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words Hi I recall that previous versions of BLFS or LFS (or maybe both) recommended installing gcc-2.3.5 in addition to gcc3. I think there were a few packages that didn't compile with gcc3, but did with gcc-2.3.5 (and I think that was the

Re: gcc 2.3.5

2005-10-11 Thread Nicholas Capitelli
--- Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words Hi I recall that previous versions of BLFS or LFS (or maybe both) recommended installing gcc-2.3.5 in addition to gcc3. I think there were a few packages that didn't compile with gcc3, but

Undefined AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, FAM-2.7.0

2005-10-11 Thread alupu
PROBLEM: undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL in FAM-2.7.0 (details below). - Books: LFS v6.1 All packages installed. No deviations. No errors. BLFS v6.1 About 2/3 of packages installed. No deviations. No errors (testimony to the professionalism and hard work of the developers). -

Re: gcc 2.3.5 (correction: gcc-2.95.3)

2005-10-11 Thread Brandin Creech
--- Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Benton wrote: True, but strangely the linux-2.6.14-rc4/README says COMPILING the kernel: - Make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 available. Serves me right for looking. I haven't installed gcc-2.95 for a long time

Re: gcc 2.3.5

2005-10-11 Thread Richard A Downing
Matthew Burgess wrote: Andrew Benton wrote: True, but strangely the linux-2.6.14-rc4/README says COMPILING the kernel: - Make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 available. Serves me right for looking. I haven't installed gcc-2.95 for a long time Andrew, you do realise that us LFSers know