Re: [blfs-support] GNOME

2013-07-21 Thread Esben Stien 
Fernando de Oliveira  writes:

> Removed from the book. Only what is needed by other packages remained.

How about announcing this to your users?. I've just spent several days
building everything up to requiring gnome-session. Now you're telling me
that all this was useless and I won't get GNOME up and running on this
build?. 

-- 
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s  a 
 http://www. s tn m
  irc://irc.  b  -  i  .   e/%23contact
   sip:b0ef@   e e 
   jid:b0ef@n n
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] GNOME

2013-07-21 Thread Esben Stien 
Ken Moffat  writes:

> Second reply, after noting that Fernando's reply is ordered in
> front of your post

You should use a threaded email client;). 

Time fixed; wouldn't be an issue if I didn't just right now figured that
my whole new build is useless.

-- 
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s  a 
 http://www. s tn m
  irc://irc.  b  -  i  .   e/%23contact
   sip:b0ef@   e e 
   jid:b0ef@n n
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] GNOME

2013-07-21 Thread Ken Moffat 
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:18:22AM +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
> Has something happened to GNOME in BLFS?. 
> 
 Second reply, after noting that Fernando's reply is ordered in
front of your post : your clock is wrong!  We can cope with people
who do this, but it's always worth suggesting that you fix it (the
approx 3 minutes part doesn't really matter, it's the difference in
the hours that is the pain :)

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] GNOME

2013-07-21 Thread Ken Moffat 
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:18:22AM +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
> Has something happened to GNOME in BLFS?. 
> 
> It's missing quite a few packages, like gnome-session. Without that,
> you're not getting very far. 
> 
> There's no mention of it anywhere. 
> 
 I think it's still in the systemd branch (sorry, I don't have a
reference for where that is rendered).  From memory, Armin removed
much of it from trunk because it is now tied in to systemd.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] GNOME

2013-07-21 Thread Fernando de Oliveira 
Em 21-07-2013 21:18, Esben Stien escreveu:
> Has something happened to GNOME in BLFS?. 
> 
> It's missing quite a few packages, like gnome-session. Without that,
> you're not getting very far. 
> 
> There's no mention of it anywhere. 
> 

Removed from the book. Only what is needed by other packages remained.

See. e.g.,






-- 
[]s,
Fernando
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-support] GNOME

2013-07-21 Thread Esben Stien 
Has something happened to GNOME in BLFS?. 

It's missing quite a few packages, like gnome-session. Without that,
you're not getting very far. 

There's no mention of it anywhere. 

-- 
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s  a 
 http://www. s tn m
  irc://irc.  b  -  i  .   e/%23contact
   sip:b0ef@   e e 
   jid:b0ef@n n
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] Initramfs, systemd. No /dev/mapper/* symlinks

2013-07-21 Thread Nathan Coulson 
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Nathan Coulson  wrote:
> I build a nice new shiny systemd build (my first "bootable" attempt).
> My root (and a few other partitions) are on a lvm partition, sitting
> on top of a mdraid1 array.
>
> When it boots the initramfs mounts root just fine,
> (root=/dev/ssd.vg/root), but the system only has /dev/mapper/control
> (when I would expect a ton of symlinks for each partition tracked by
> devicemapper).  Typing in dmset mknodes does recreate them though.
>
>
> I tested it on my existing LFS System (Similar, except root is on it's
> own partition, instead of the lvm on mdraid0, but it still mounts the
> partitions in the lvm in the mount bootscript) and it works fine.
>
>
>
>
> (Also, sleep is now in usr//bin/sleep, while udevadm is in /bin, but
> doing more testing before I bring that up)
>
> --
> Nathan Coulson (conathan)

Found a couple systemd scripts in lvm (Installed via make
install_systemd_generators, and install_systemd_units), although there
is a hardcoded path to lvm.

I fixed it with a ln -s /sbin/lvm /usr/sbin/lvm, but could also be
fixed with a sed against lvm2_activation_generator_systemd_red_hat.c.


(I have not poked at it too deeply, but the generators look like they
are responsible for vgchange.  I think the units are for monitoring
[again, new to systemd])





-- 
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
--
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Timezone: PST (-8)
Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page