How come packages in BLFS are not listed in order of precedence, the way they are in LFS? Rather, they are listed in alphabetical order in each section. Wouldn't it make more sense to list packages in order as they are required by subsequent packages? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- [blfs-support] A Question on Package Ordering Rob
- Re: [blfs-support] A Question on Package Ordering Pierre Labastie